↓ Skip to main content

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and encephalomyelitis disseminata/multiple sclerosis show remarkable levels of similarity in phenomenology and neuroimmune characteristics

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
260 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
47 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
258 Mendeley
Title
Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and encephalomyelitis disseminata/multiple sclerosis show remarkable levels of similarity in phenomenology and neuroimmune characteristics
Published in
BMC Medicine, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-11-205
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerwyn Morris, Michael Maes

Abstract

'Encephalomyelitis disseminata' (multiple sclerosis) and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) are both classified as diseases of the central nervous system by the World Health Organization. This review aims to compare the phenomenological and neuroimmune characteristics of MS with those of ME/CFS.

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 260 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Spain 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 248 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 11%
Student > Bachelor 28 11%
Student > Master 26 10%
Other 22 9%
Other 53 21%
Unknown 63 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 7%
Neuroscience 17 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 6%
Other 46 18%
Unknown 69 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 199. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2023.
All research outputs
#187,086
of 24,495,443 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#163
of 3,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,330
of 207,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#6
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,495,443 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.