↓ Skip to main content

Timely approaches to identify probiotic species of the genus Lactobacillus

Overview of attention for article published in Gut Pathogens, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
Title
Timely approaches to identify probiotic species of the genus Lactobacillus
Published in
Gut Pathogens, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1757-4749-5-27
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan R Herbel, Wilfried Vahjen, Lothar H Wieler, Sebastian Guenther

Abstract

Over the past decades the use of probiotics in food has increased largely due to the manufacturer's interest in placing "healthy" food on the market based on the consumer's ambitions to live healthy. Due to this trend, health benefits of products containing probiotic strains such as lactobacilli are promoted and probiotic strains have been established in many different products with their numbers increasing steadily. Probiotics are used as starter cultures in dairy products such as cheese or yoghurts and in addition they are also utilized in non-dairy products such as fermented vegetables, fermented meat and pharmaceuticals, thereby, covering a large variety of products.To assure quality management, several pheno-, physico- and genotyping methods have been established to unambiguously identify probiotic lactobacilli. These methods are often specific enough to identify the probiotic strains at genus and species levels. However, the probiotic ability is often strain dependent and it is impossible to distinguish strains by basic microbiological methods.Therefore, this review aims to critically summarize and evaluate conventional identification methods for the genus Lactobacillus, complemented by techniques that are currently being developed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 146 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 17%
Researcher 23 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Student > Master 15 10%
Other 11 7%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 29 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 3%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 34 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2013.
All research outputs
#6,392,538
of 25,388,353 outputs
Outputs from Gut Pathogens
#132
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,761
of 213,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gut Pathogens
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,353 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them