↓ Skip to main content

The effect of a low-fat, plant-based lifestyle intervention (CHIP) on serum HDL levels and the implications for metabolic syndrome status – a cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition & Metabolism, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
22 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
Title
The effect of a low-fat, plant-based lifestyle intervention (CHIP) on serum HDL levels and the implications for metabolic syndrome status – a cohort study
Published in
Nutrition & Metabolism, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1743-7075-10-58
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lillian Kent, Darren Morton, Paul Rankin, Ewan Ward, Ross Grant, John Gobble, Hans Diehl

Abstract

Low levels of high-density lipoproteins (HDL) are considered an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease and constitute one of the criteria for the Metabolic Syndrome (MetS). Lifestyle interventions promoting a low-fat, plant-based eating pattern appear to paradoxically reduce cardiovascular risk but also HDL levels. This study examined the changes in MetS risk factors, in particular HDL, in a large cohort participating in a 30-day lifestyle intervention that promoted a low-fat, plant-based eating pattern.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Unknown 104 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 23%
Student > Bachelor 17 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Researcher 10 9%
Other 8 7%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 25 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Psychology 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 26 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,289,047
of 26,362,847 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition & Metabolism
#174
of 1,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,138
of 221,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition & Metabolism
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,362,847 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.