The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 354 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
RETRACTED ARTICLE: DNA barcoding detects contamination and substitution in North American herbal products
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-11-222 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steven G Newmaster, Meghan Grguric, Dhivya Shanmughanandhan, Sathishkumar Ramalingam, Subramanyam Ragupathy |
| Abstract |
Herbal products available to consumers in the marketplace may be contaminated or substituted with alternative plant species and fillers that are not listed on the labels. According to the World Health Organization, the adulteration of herbal products is a threat to consumer safety. Our research aimed to investigate herbal product integrity and authenticity with the goal of protecting consumers from health risks associated with product substitution and contamination. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 71 | 20% |
| Canada | 29 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 16 | 5% |
| Australia | 7 | 2% |
| Thailand | 6 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 1% |
| Mexico | 3 | <1% |
| Kazakhstan | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 19 | 5% |
| Unknown | 194 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 238 | 67% |
| Scientists | 63 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 40 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 13 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 558 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 2% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| India | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 527 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 99 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 79 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 74 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 68 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 31 | 6% |
| Other | 119 | 21% |
| Unknown | 88 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 188 | 34% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 76 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 37 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 21 | 4% |
| Other | 70 | 13% |
| Unknown | 104 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1164. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2024.
All research outputs
#13,238
of 26,386,754 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#24
of 4,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52
of 225,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#1
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,386,754 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.