↓ Skip to main content

Segmental lumbar mobility in individuals with low back pain: in vivo assessment during manual and self-imposed motion using dynamic MRI

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
Title
Segmental lumbar mobility in individuals with low back pain: in vivo assessment during manual and self-imposed motion using dynamic MRI
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, January 2007
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-8-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kornelia Kulig, Christopher M Powers, Robert F Landel, Hungwen Chen, Michael Fredericson, Marc Guillet, Kim Butts

Abstract

Altered spinal mobility is thought to be related to current or past episodes of low back pain; however evidence of that relationship in younger subjects has not been established. The purpose of this study was to compare lumbar segmental mobility in asymptomatic and symptomatic subjects during posterior to anterior (PA) manual spinal mobilization and a self-initiated prone press-up (PU) maneuver. We hypothesized that persons with central low back pain would have an altered lumbar segmental mobility pattern compared to those without pain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 169 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 26 15%
Student > Master 26 15%
Researcher 20 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Other 42 24%
Unknown 23 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 19%
Sports and Recreations 15 8%
Engineering 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 26 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2021.
All research outputs
#3,110,729
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#636
of 4,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,981
of 161,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.