↓ Skip to main content

Interrater reliability of clinical tests to evaluate scapulothoracic motion

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Interrater reliability of clinical tests to evaluate scapulothoracic motion
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-315
Pubmed ID
Authors

Evelyn Baertschi, Jaap Swanenburg, Florian Brunner, Jan Kool

Abstract

Decreased scapulothoracic motion has been associated with various pathologies of the shoulder. Reliable and simple assessment methods of scapular mobility are, however lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the interrater reliability of four clinical tests to assess scapulothoracic motion in patients with a slightly restricted shoulder flexion.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Unknown 95 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 40%
Student > Bachelor 18 18%
Researcher 9 9%
Other 9 9%
Lecturer 5 5%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 6 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 21%
Sports and Recreations 12 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 9 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2017.
All research outputs
#2,073,150
of 14,237,171 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#447
of 2,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,003
of 186,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#39
of 346 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,237,171 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 346 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.