↓ Skip to main content

Interrater reliability of clinical tests to evaluate scapulothoracic motion

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
Title
Interrater reliability of clinical tests to evaluate scapulothoracic motion
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-315
Pubmed ID
Authors

Evelyn Baertschi, Jaap Swanenburg, Florian Brunner, Jan Kool

Abstract

Decreased scapulothoracic motion has been associated with various pathologies of the shoulder. Reliable and simple assessment methods of scapular mobility are, however lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the interrater reliability of four clinical tests to assess scapulothoracic motion in patients with a slightly restricted shoulder flexion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 143 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 37%
Student > Bachelor 31 21%
Researcher 11 8%
Other 9 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 5%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 20 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 23%
Sports and Recreations 18 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Physics and Astronomy 6 4%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 26 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2017.
All research outputs
#4,025,189
of 23,011,300 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#790
of 4,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,020
of 216,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#8
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,011,300 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,091 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.