Title |
The effectiveness of police custody assessments in identifying suspects with intellectual disabilities and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, November 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-11-248 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Susan Young, Emily J Goodwin, Ottilie Sedgwick, Gisli H Gudjonsson |
Abstract |
Intellectual Disabilities (ID) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) are recognized psychological vulnerabilities in police interviews and court proceedings in England and Wales. The aims of this study were to investigate: (a) the prevalence of ID and/or ADHD among suspects detained at a large London metropolitan police station and their relationship with conduct disorder (CD), (b) the impact of their condition on police staff resources, (c) the effectiveness of current custody assessment tools in identifying psychological vulnerabilities, and (d) the use of 'Appropriate Adults' in interviews. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 45% |
United States | 2 | 18% |
India | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 130 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 26 | 19% |
Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 9% |
Researcher | 10 | 7% |
Other | 28 | 21% |
Unknown | 31 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 44 | 33% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 16% |
Social Sciences | 18 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 7% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 1% |
Other | 7 | 5% |
Unknown | 34 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,938,765
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,365
of 4,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,705
of 317,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#28
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.