↓ Skip to main content

Implementing large-scale workforce change: learning from 55 pilot sites of allied health workforce redesign in Queensland, Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Implementing large-scale workforce change: learning from 55 pilot sites of allied health workforce redesign in Queensland, Australia
Published in
Human Resources for Health, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1478-4491-11-66
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan A Nancarrow, Alison Roots, Sandra Grace, Anna M Moran, Kerry Vanniekerk-Lyons

Abstract

Increasingly, health workforces are undergoing high-level 're-engineering' to help them better meet the needs of the population, workforce and service delivery. Queensland Health implemented a large scale 5-year workforce redesign program across more than 13 health-care disciplines. This study synthesized the findings from this program to identify and codify mechanisms associated with successful workforce redesign to help inform other large workforce projects.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Ireland 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Poland 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 43 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 22%
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Professor 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Other 14 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 31%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 14%
Social Sciences 6 12%
Unspecified 4 8%
Other 9 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2017.
All research outputs
#1,626,450
of 12,440,396 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#207
of 665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,902
of 229,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#16
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,440,396 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.