@idea_alchemist People need to see each other's faces to communicate empathy which is needed for critically important social bonds: https://t.co/SuNejCRnFV The respiratory infection limiting effect of masking is extremely questionable and not worth such
RT @akaharaimori29: 「共感と関係の継続性に対するフェイスマスクの効果:プライマリケアにおけるランダム化比較試験(2013)」 https://t.co/0xpoEQ37ue
RT @theodorepak: Others have already broken down the pitiful survey data that underlies the entire argument against masking in this op-ed,…
RT @LazarusLong13: Always read the studies antimaskers cite. Sigh. 1 point difference between the mask and no mask groups. 33.93 versus…
RT @LazarusLong13: @gregggonsalves @AnnalsofIM The "harms" studies are shockingly weak. In fact, one of them was the pretty famous survey…
RT @Loretta_Torrago: A closer look at the studies behind the push to end universal masking in healthcare and the craven indecency of using…
.@LazarusLong13 is great for putting sometimes complex topics into language that’s accessible for everyone. Here he breaks down the false claim that “masks don’t work”
A closer look at the studies behind the push to end universal masking in healthcare and the craven indecency of using an article that quotes HCWs begging for PPE while denouncing antimaskers to suit an antimask agenda.
RT @LazarusLong13: Always read the studies antimaskers cite. Sigh. 1 point difference between the mask and no mask groups. 33.93 versus…
RT @LazarusLong13: Always read the studies antimaskers cite. Sigh. 1 point difference between the mask and no mask groups. 33.93 versus…
RT @LazarusLong13: Always read the studies antimaskers cite. Sigh. 1 point difference between the mask and no mask groups. 33.93 versus…
@Loretta_Torrago I took a look at the "harms". https://t.co/ptpvFfCKKV
Others have already broken down the pitiful survey data that underlies the entire argument against masking in this op-ed, including an RCT on patient perceptions of masked/unmasked doctors from ... 2013! 🤪 https://t.co/iHYnRiOcBV
RT @LazarusLong13: Always read the studies antimaskers cite. Sigh. 1 point difference between the mask and no mask groups. 33.93 versus…
RT @LazarusLong13: @gregggonsalves @AnnalsofIM The "harms" studies are shockingly weak. In fact, one of them was the pretty famous survey…
@gregggonsalves @AnnalsofIM The "harms" studies are shockingly weak. In fact, one of them was the pretty famous survey that revealed HCWs were suffering mentally because of lack of support from their administration. Both morally, and with PPE. https://t
RT @LazarusLong13: Always read the studies antimaskers cite. Sigh. 1 point difference between the mask and no mask groups. 33.93 versus…
I’m starting to think antimaskers just think killing strangers is better than mild discomfort
RT @LazarusLong13: Always read the studies antimaskers cite. Sigh. 1 point difference between the mask and no mask groups. 33.93 versus…
RT @LazarusLong13: Always read the studies antimaskers cite. Sigh. 1 point difference between the mask and no mask groups. 33.93 versus…
RT @LazarusLong13: Always read the studies antimaskers cite. Sigh. 1 point difference between the mask and no mask groups. 33.93 versus…
RT @LazarusLong13: Always read the studies antimaskers cite. Sigh. 1 point difference between the mask and no mask groups. 33.93 versus…
RT @LazarusLong13: Always read the studies antimaskers cite. Sigh. 1 point difference between the mask and no mask groups. 33.93 versus…
RT @LazarusLong13: Always read the studies antimaskers cite. Sigh. 1 point difference between the mask and no mask groups. 33.93 versus…
RT @LazarusLong13: Always read the studies antimaskers cite. Sigh. 1 point difference between the mask and no mask groups. 33.93 versus…
RT @LazarusLong13: Always read the studies antimaskers cite. Sigh. 1 point difference between the mask and no mask groups. 33.93 versus…
RT @LazarusLong13: Always read the studies antimaskers cite. Sigh. 1 point difference between the mask and no mask groups. 33.93 versus…
Always read the studies antimaskers cite. Sigh. 1 point difference between the mask and no mask groups. 33.93 versus 34.92. Out of 50. And if you don't know the doctor well? No loss of empathy. https://t.co/zlCOVGl178 https://t.co/hbUKTjJHHj
@hstupak1 Very true Empathy vs Masks 2013 Randomized Trial found patients perceived doctors as having more empathy when not wearing masks https://t.co/VhFJwUTJdW
@jilevin RCT from 2013: Masks vs patient empathy: Patients perceived less empathy from doctors when masks worn. https://t.co/VhFJwUTJdW
@benryanwriter Empathy vs Masks: 2013 Randomized Controlled Trial Suggests patients may perceive less empathy from doctors when masks worn https://t.co/VhFJwUTJdW
Very true! Doctors & patients need to see faces to improve communication and reduce errors. 2013 Randomized Trial found that masks reduced patients' perception of doctor's empathy https://t.co/VhFJwUTJdW
@drvictoriafox @subsix848 2013 RCT on Masks & Empathy When doctors wear masks during patient consultation, patients perceive reduced empathy from doctor -Study done in Hong Kong in 2013 -1030 patients randomized to doctors wearing or not wearing mas
「共感と関係の継続性に対するフェイスマスクの効果:プライマリケアにおけるランダム化比較試験(2013)」 https://t.co/0xpoEQ37ue
RT @samanthaagodwin: Masks have frequently been touted as cost-free, and opposition to mask mandates as motivated only by nefarious Trumpis…
RT @5rHxIhQGQnnRSOe: 画像引用元 https://t.co/yTcEysYtCW ランセットの引用論文リストーRCT4つ https://t.co/f2IEoT3V20 各RCT論文リンク https://t.co/ekXR0y61nl https://t.…
RT @5rHxIhQGQnnRSOe: 画像引用元 https://t.co/yTcEysYtCW ランセットの引用論文リストーRCT4つ https://t.co/f2IEoT3V20 各RCT論文リンク https://t.co/ekXR0y61nl https://t.…
RT @5rHxIhQGQnnRSOe: 画像引用元 https://t.co/yTcEysYtCW ランセットの引用論文リストーRCT4つ https://t.co/f2IEoT3V20 各RCT論文リンク https://t.co/ekXR0y61nl https://t.…
画像引用元 https://t.co/yTcEysYtCW ランセットの引用論文リストーRCT4つ https://t.co/f2IEoT3V20 各RCT論文リンク https://t.co/ekXR0y61nl https://t.co/GlYU1jiJCl https://t.co/Fb5XtTf9pH https://t.co/eJ3topQmWV
@Jtrainorjustj @ChelsieHamlin Masking impedes empathy: https://t.co/8yaHCxAjOL Lack of social connection, which masking could exacerbate, has its own set of health risks: https://t.co/Y3efR7eGJ2
RT @samanthaagodwin: Masks have frequently been touted as cost-free, and opposition to mask mandates as motivated only by nefarious Trumpis…
@rfeynmansBongos @barbara_kuks @drsimonegold We don't have decades of use in all social interactions. And even the more limited work-confined mask wearing has been shown to have adverse effects https://t.co/8yaHCxAjOL
@rfeynmansBongos @barbara_kuks @drsimonegold That's good that children did not wear masks there. I see frightened parents masking their children here all the time. Those people were not wearing it in all their social interactions. And even with that, we h
@rfeynmansBongos @barbara_kuks @drsimonegold 1/2 We *don't* know what prolonged mask wearing does. We have never had people wear them in *all* social interactions. We have indications it's harmful: https://t.co/8yaHCxAjOL
RT @MonicaGandhi9: @sdbaral HI @sdbaral- think you will be interested in this (family practice-led) study in 2013. Half of doctors randomiz…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: @sdbaral HI @sdbaral- think you will be interested in this (family practice-led) study in 2013. Half of doctors randomiz…
Thus, this Texas legal win is long overdue, and I want to congratulate you for it. Important references: https://t.co/N15lZwQbQh https://t.co/MfTa613FvO https://t.co/IxCcm6z7qu
RT @UsforThemUK: @KirstieMAllsopp @guardian Link to study https://t.co/ckAi5H19X1
RT @UsforThemUK: @KirstieMAllsopp @guardian Link to study https://t.co/ckAi5H19X1
@KirstieMAllsopp @guardian Link to study https://t.co/ckAi5H19X1
Effect of facemasks on empathy and relational continuity: a randomised controlled trial in primary care https://t.co/Aiem8pa2ud
Hey @UCSF, you all still do journal clubs? One of your faculty members could use a refresher.
Dr. Gandhi...What important bit of information changed in 2020???
the dose of masking was too low they didnt start masking early enough did they assess if masking levels were low prior to the study?
RT @KelleyKga: The replies to this are mind boggling. People seem to think something magical happened in 2020 where masks became impenetrab…
RT @nurse___SH: Hey Monica- if you repeated this study NOW during the pandemic, I imagine you’d have drastically different results.
RT @MonicaGandhi9: @sdbaral HI @sdbaral- think you will be interested in this (family practice-led) study in 2013. Half of doctors randomiz…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: @sdbaral HI @sdbaral- think you will be interested in this (family practice-led) study in 2013. Half of doctors randomiz…
Well, yes. If one assumes nonverbal communication amounts to some 45% of information content, that comes from reading people's faces. The idea this doesn't matter indicates a blind spot more than any reality. https://t.co/QdtBz2SYnd
Hey Monica- if you repeated this study NOW during the pandemic, I imagine you’d have drastically different results.
RT @realEDdoc: Yet another reason patient satisfaction scoring is detrimental to physician AND patient care. Ultimately doing right for yo…
RT @realEDdoc: Yet another reason patient satisfaction scoring is detrimental to physician AND patient care. Ultimately doing right for yo…
Yet another reason patient satisfaction scoring is detrimental to physician AND patient care. Ultimately doing right for your patient is more important than being their buddy and enabling risky behaviors. Grow up and do the right thing instead of the eas
RT @NotClever4: Cool, love building a good relationship with my empathetic doctor with no mask, since they're going to infect me with covid…
@interpolated @lelia_glass @jenneraub Here it is: https://t.co/E4Mb7GPyLF
RT @MonicaGandhi9: @sdbaral HI @sdbaral- think you will be interested in this (family practice-led) study in 2013. Half of doctors randomiz…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: @sdbaral HI @sdbaral- think you will be interested in this (family practice-led) study in 2013. Half of doctors randomiz…
RT @KelleyKga: The replies to this are mind boggling. People seem to think something magical happened in 2020 where masks became impenetrab…
@impaziente0
RT @MonicaGandhi9: @sdbaral HI @sdbaral- think you will be interested in this (family practice-led) study in 2013. Half of doctors randomiz…
RT @KelleyKga: The replies to this are mind boggling. People seem to think something magical happened in 2020 where masks became impenetrab…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: @sdbaral HI @sdbaral- think you will be interested in this (family practice-led) study in 2013. Half of doctors randomiz…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: @sdbaral HI @sdbaral- think you will be interested in this (family practice-led) study in 2013. Half of doctors randomiz…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: @sdbaral HI @sdbaral- think you will be interested in this (family practice-led) study in 2013. Half of doctors randomiz…
RT @KelleyKga: The replies to this are mind boggling. People seem to think something magical happened in 2020 where masks became impenetrab…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: @sdbaral HI @sdbaral- think you will be interested in this (family practice-led) study in 2013. Half of doctors randomiz…
The replies to this are mind boggling. People seem to think something magical happened in 2020 where masks became impenetrable force fields against disease, and at the same time, human connection ceased to be relevant.
RT @MonicaGandhi9: @sdbaral HI @sdbaral- think you will be interested in this (family practice-led) study in 2013. Half of doctors randomiz…
Online, mask resisters are vilified by pro-maskers as uncaring. My offline experience, non-wearers went out of their way to be kind to others. YMMV but massless face to face is normal and natural for creating/expressing empathy.
RT @MonicaGandhi9: @sdbaral HI @sdbaral- think you will be interested in this (family practice-led) study in 2013. Half of doctors randomiz…
@FinchTH If anyone is bored and wants to go through it https://t.co/aZ3joOSH3X
RT @shathebaker: @grahamwalker and yeah, read the whole study: masks were negatively correlated with feeling doc. was empathic, but not wi…
I wonder if anything has happened since 2013 that could affect perception of people wearing surgical masks
@grahamwalker and yeah, read the whole study: masks were negatively correlated with feeling doc. was empathic, but not with patients understanding of their medical issues or with patient satisfaction open access article: https://t.co/QO0ht2Roxm
RT @MonicaGandhi9: @sdbaral HI @sdbaral- think you will be interested in this (family practice-led) study in 2013. Half of doctors randomiz…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: @sdbaral HI @sdbaral- think you will be interested in this (family practice-led) study in 2013. Half of doctors randomiz…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: @sdbaral HI @sdbaral- think you will be interested in this (family practice-led) study in 2013. Half of doctors randomiz…
Read the full text: was no difference in patient satisfaction or enablement, and the tiny “empathy” score diff. is not clinically significant. Also suspect Hawthorne effect, since there was a profound interaction between empathy score and whether the patie
RT @MonicaGandhi9: @sdbaral HI @sdbaral- think you will be interested in this (family practice-led) study in 2013. Half of doctors randomiz…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: @sdbaral HI @sdbaral- think you will be interested in this (family practice-led) study in 2013. Half of doctors randomiz…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: @sdbaral HI @sdbaral- think you will be interested in this (family practice-led) study in 2013. Half of doctors randomiz…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: @sdbaral HI @sdbaral- think you will be interested in this (family practice-led) study in 2013. Half of doctors randomiz…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: @sdbaral HI @sdbaral- think you will be interested in this (family practice-led) study in 2013. Half of doctors randomiz…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: @sdbaral HI @sdbaral- think you will be interested in this (family practice-led) study in 2013. Half of doctors randomiz…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: @sdbaral HI @sdbaral- think you will be interested in this (family practice-led) study in 2013. Half of doctors randomiz…