Peering through the mist: systematic review of what the chemistry of contaminants in electronic cigs http://t.co/4L0K4BuWoP #bmcpublichealth
New study confirms that chemicals in electronic cigarettes pose minimal health risk #ecigs #ftw #vape http://t.co/NliWUr7mEG
Burstyn: chemistry of contaminants in electronic cigarettes http://t.co/XMQ9eh1HJf funded by CASAA #ecigs #vape #vaping
@kertime List here http://t.co/iEJKomYB2F New study http://t.co/LqwFH7yTBh Excellent review of toxicology http://t.co/CAoyo1A7YR
@Maluavi @suanycr @msaludcr esto me parece serio http://t.co/uTvqixk6lJ
A good read for an education on e-cigarettes and the (NON) impact on users and bystanders http://t.co/lwVArPblxm
.@ProfGlantz - strange to call the Burstyn paper "internet published" when it was published in an academic journal: http://t.co/bDNKyXVj98 …
.@ProfGlantz - strange to call the Burstyn paper "internet published" when it was published in an academic journal: http://t.co/bDNKyXVj98 …
.@ProfGlantz - strange to call the Burstyn paper "internet published" when it was published in an academic journal: http://t.co/bDNKyXVj98 …
#chidont smoke anymore thanks to #Vaping, and it doesn't harm the people around me!! :) http://t.co/6RKegm1gFd
#chidont smoke anymore thanks to #Vaping, and it doesn't harm the people around me!! :) http://t.co/6RKegm1gFd
#chidont smoke anymore thanks to #Vaping, and it doesn't harm the people around me!! :) http://t.co/6RKegm1gFd
@TobaccoFreeKids @nytimes @mrichtel and some don't.. http://t.co/anFFwQgJzJ
@RainbowHealth @AlexCarlson8 PS Rainbow warriors: http://t.co/lEXk0S6wba
@eileenshepherd No ‘passive vaping’: http://t.co/2qpvmh9Bup
Peering through the mist: systematic review of what the chemistry of contaminants in electronic cigarett... http://t.co/HxsP1WtxKD #ecig
@AbtExecSearch @CaeruleanSea @JeffaStier @Lizzyfit Scary sounding chemicals != harm. Is fog machine vapor 'smoke'? http://t.co/CAoyo1A7YR
@AbtExecSearch @CaeruleanSea @JeffaStier @Lizzyfit Scary sounding chemicals != harm. Is fog machine vapor 'smoke'? http://t.co/CAoyo1A7YR
@stvfdz @javierpadillab http://t.co/gruMXhgb8p este es estudio contrastado,revisado y publicado.dice cosas bien distintas.Entienda extrañeza
@AmericanCancer Very true! Here is a recent systematic review of #ecigs http://t.co/TfzLiv3bPC
@tthornb @campfirewood How serious compared to inhaling burning smoke? http://t.co/CAoyo1A7YR
LOL http://t.co/CAoyo1A7YR http://t.co/v9Nb9FsxvN MT @CarrieHKelly Your #vape or #ecig particulates are as bad as smoke for 2nd hand
I shared a link on Facebook http://t.co/EPsEssp49x banyak lagi bende nak kena baca, journal ni plak yang aku g baca. pfffftttttt!~
LOL http://t.co/CAoyo1A7YR http://t.co/v9Nb9FsxvN MT @CarrieHKelly Your #vape or #ecig particulates are as bad as smoke for 2nd hand
LOL http://t.co/CAoyo1A7YR http://t.co/v9Nb9FsxvN MT @CarrieHKelly Your #vape or #ecig particulates are as bad as smoke for 2nd hand
LOL http://t.co/CAoyo1A7YR http://t.co/v9Nb9FsxvN MT @CarrieHKelly Your #vape or #ecig particulates are as bad as smoke for 2nd hand
LOL http://t.co/CAoyo1A7YR http://t.co/v9Nb9FsxvN MT @CarrieHKelly Your #vape or #ecig particulates are as bad as smoke for 2nd hand
@msnbc's Andrea Mitchell: "We may now find out what's actually in #ecigs." Sigh: http://t.co/yT6uWnKHc9
@WorldLungFdn Adults know what's in them http://t.co/7Qk2LsB4p8
@marybeth05 Almost entirely harmless propylene glycol and/or vegetable glycerin http://t.co/CAoyo1A7YR
The Burstyn study from Drexel has been published this may be useful http://t.co/jekmMYjFCJ #noharm #improof #THRlies
@GregTHR @jaymer this may be useful http://t.co/jekmMYjFCJ
@marybeth05 Almost entirely harmless propylene glycol and/or vegetable glycerin http://t.co/CAoyo1A7YR
Peering through the mist, a systematic review on the chemistry in eliquids and how they affect health: http://t.co/wj1BVmM9K9
@SenatorDurbin Study - no evidence that vapor produces exposure to contaminants that would warrant health concerns http://t.co/anFFwQgJzJ
@Patrick_ORourke - How about doing an article on this study http://t.co/5kOUeusSyj - Those are peer reviewed FACTS - @SWAMPERGENE.
Kinda informing if your in to e cigs http://t.co/vad6FZ47qX
.@ProspectPage It's clear vapor is not a hazard to bystanders. No harmful level of any chemical has ever been found http://t.co/dFrsyA2kE8
So, Wales, e-cig vapour (containments plus declared ingredients) "pose no apparent concern" to bystanders health. http://t.co/kqj2g7kQnB
@ChrisShields Agreed. Policy should be informed by science, not try to predict it. Science is saying its not harmful. http://t.co/2aZOHm4RqE
.@ProspectPage It's clear vapor is not a hazard to bystanders. No harmful level of any chemical has ever been found http://t.co/dFrsyA2kE8
.@ProspectPage It's clear vapor is not a hazard to bystanders. No harmful level of any chemical has ever been found http://t.co/dFrsyA2kE8
@3000milesNorth Thanks for reading. Two great reviews if you're interested http://t.co/CAoyo1A7YR http://t.co/0h5N4iCdX9
@3000milesNorth But we do know traditional cigarettes cause death! http://t.co/SFsKG2ESnQ Studies are there, just ask :)
Peering through the mist: #Ecig study http://t.co/BOGlz7Z4gR
@DavidAgus psst... http://t.co/q29bJ12t7T #ecigs save lives #IMPROOF
Peering through the mist: #Ecig study http://t.co/BOGlz7Z4gR
BlacksmithPro shared a link "http://t.co/dHIWMl6wbU" on VapeTV http://t.co/ZdQ84MZbJ7
@arunamiller before sponsoring a bill you should be educated on the facts: http://t.co/ax7xyW6PgV cc: @CASSAMedia #ECigs
@livcigs: Peer Reviewed Electronic Cigarette Study declares exposure to #ecigs fall well below threshold for toxicity http://t.co/CMyIbng8HO
Peer Reviewed Electronic Cigarette Study declares exposure to #ecigs fall well below threshold for toxicity http://t.co/KeQG5wazBF #vaping
@jfkisgr8 @joshgreenman Science on e-cig vapor is clear http://t.co/CAoyo1A7YR And that article is junk http://t.co/6OYjWrmgeB
@jfkisgr8 @joshgreenman Science on e-cig vapor is clear http://t.co/CAoyo1A7YR And that article is junk http://t.co/6OYjWrmgeB
Peering through the mist: systematic review of what the chemistry of contaminants in e-cigarettes tells us … #vape http://t.co/mORffGuHJi
.@ajm6792 @ACSCANMinnesota Nah, I look at the science and the results. Cig sales falling fast. http://t.co/CAoyo1A7YR http://t.co/nRKamx9PH6
.@ajm6792 @ACSCANMinnesota Nah, I look at the science and the results. Cig sales falling fast. http://t.co/CAoyo1A7YR http://t.co/nRKamx9PH6
.@ajm6792 @ACSCANMinnesota Nah, I look at the science and the results. Cig sales falling fast. http://t.co/CAoyo1A7YR http://t.co/nRKamx9PH6
@BioMedCentral systematic review on vapourising chemicals in ecigs;harm -no evidence ,personal exposure -some concern http://t.co/7jBFMtGnou
@BioMedCentral systematic review on vapourising chemicals in ecigs;harm -no evidence ,personal exposure -some concern http://t.co/7jBFMtGnou
Ssystematic review of what the chemistry of contaminants in electronic cigarettes tells us about health risks http://t.co/AGNnFwATVy
What? E-cigs are safe? NO WAY! http://t.co/KZlBc25Ljp http://t.co/V6q0LSbozd
@CheriPreston For studies, check out these two articles http://t.co/0h5N4iCdX9 http://t.co/CAoyo1A7YR
This study counters everything LA Councilman @PaulKoretzCD5 told me on @KPFK were his reasons 4 banning e-cigs: http://t.co/k7Nc8AJHPA
@jsgaetano @TheBradBlog Here's a link to some ACTUAL research: Abstract: http://t.co/kJQpITfGLC PDF: http://t.co/Vsi3hy9Y0Q
"the corres. daily dose of...50 puffs is about10,000 times lower than allowable daily intake according to CDC" http://t.co/j0gQ6l4SRe #mnleg
"the results can be misleading and not interpretable for risk assessment." - peer review response to "metals" http://t.co/j0gQ6l4SRe #mnleg
"the corres. daily dose of...50 puffs is about10,000 times lower than allowable daily intake according to CDC" http://t.co/j0gQ6l4SRe #mnleg
"the corres. daily dose of...50 puffs is about10,000 times lower than allowable daily intake according to CDC" http://t.co/j0gQ6l4SRe #mnleg
"the results can be misleading and not interpretable for risk assessment." - peer review response to "metals" http://t.co/j0gQ6l4SRe #mnleg
http://t.co/Lpy2xfoJr3 @IrishRail
@geoffpugh @PcklessPentiful @philmellows Risk to bystanders? No. http://t.co/CAoyo1A7YR http://t.co/nRKamx9PH6 http://t.co/2rG3AgsrRT
@geoffpugh @PcklessPentiful @philmellows Risk to bystanders? No. http://t.co/CAoyo1A7YR http://t.co/nRKamx9PH6 http://t.co/2rG3AgsrRT
@meatbrain @ECigzz @DavidJGarth @peytonjames Read and be educated http://t.co/NplKfuoRiV or http://t.co/6H1lv9vfCY
@meatbrain @ECigzz @DavidJGarth @peytonjames Read and be educated http://t.co/NplKfuoRiV or http://t.co/6H1lv9vfCY
Peering through the mist: systematic review of chemistry of contaminants in electronic cigarettes & health risks http://t.co/SlfpAJg3IZ
interesting read on #vaping #ecigarette from #biomed by Professor Igor Burstyn http://t.co/9gGLKSUT8a #vapelife
@IdahoShorebird @whycherrywhy Please consider reading these http://t.co/8d7vUBFwS9 http://t.co/dFrsyA2kE8
.@Jess_K_2 Consumer advocacy organization -- funded by consumer donations. Maybe you should read it. http://t.co/CAoyo1A7YR #mnleg
.@Jess_K_2 Consumer advocacy organization -- funded by consumer donations. Maybe you should read it. http://t.co/CAoyo1A7YR #mnleg
.@Jess_K_2 Consumer advocacy organization -- funded by consumer donations. Maybe you should read it. http://t.co/CAoyo1A7YR #mnleg
.@Jess_K_2 Consumer advocacy organization -- funded by consumer donations. Maybe you should read it. http://t.co/CAoyo1A7YR
.@drpatfarrell E-cigs don't produce smoke. SMH http://t.co/gSApHPIjAN http://t.co/5IATypypX8 http://t.co/0h5N4ik4J1
@ProfGlantz @cjsnowdon @ericmar415 - all for imagined risks. Credible science (and common sense) show nugatory risk - http://t.co/7iamt8NgWR
.@Wh1pper @WomensHealthMag Check out these 3 papers http://t.co/d1m19LWdi0 http://t.co/5IATypypX8 http://t.co/0h5N4ik4J1
Looking for some Saturday reading? Catch up on this study published Jan 9th about the health risk of ecigs (PDF link) http://t.co/hwNtHpw0AM
.@AudibleRx Big mistake to believe hype about thirdhand smoke / vapor http://t.co/hv9dJ1lzpJ http://t.co/gSApHPIjAN
Looking for some Saturday reading? Catch up on this study published Jan 9th about the health risk of ecigs (PDF link) http://t.co/hwNtHpw0AM
.@AudibleRx Big mistake to believe hype about thirdhand smoke / vapor http://t.co/hv9dJ1lzpJ http://t.co/gSApHPIjAN
.@AudibleRx Big mistake to believe hype about thirdhand smoke / vapor http://t.co/hv9dJ1lzpJ http://t.co/gSApHPIjAN
.@AudibleRx Big mistake to believe hype about thirdhand smoke / vapor http://t.co/hv9dJ1lzpJ http://t.co/gSApHPIjAN
.@drpatfarrell E-cigs don't produce smoke. SMH http://t.co/gSApHPIjAN http://t.co/5IATypypX8 http://t.co/0h5N4ik4J1
.@drpatfarrell E-cigs don't produce smoke. SMH http://t.co/gSApHPIjAN http://t.co/5IATypypX8 http://t.co/0h5N4ik4J1
.@drpatfarrell E-cigs don't produce smoke. SMH http://t.co/gSApHPIjAN http://t.co/5IATypypX8 http://t.co/0h5N4ik4J1
@FlowervineMom No, they don't. @RogerBezanis has a history of making false, almost parody-like claims about e-cigs. http://t.co/gSApHPIjAN