RT @Clive_Bates: .@sarahknapton willful ignorance? That's rude and wrong. Try these: http://t.co/SCSvjgqAPR http://t.co/mFBCqPkOrU http://t…
RT @Clive_Bates: .@sarahknapton willful ignorance? That's rude and wrong. Try these: http://t.co/SCSvjgqAPR http://t.co/mFBCqPkOrU http://t…
.@sarahknapton willful ignorance? That's rude and wrong. Try these: http://t.co/SCSvjgqAPR http://t.co/mFBCqPkOrU http://t.co/Kqqum817MX
RT @mihotep: .@Ivalaine @GregTHR not enough data? What about these 9000+ observations? http://t.co/a0smDdR6U7
RT @mihotep: .@Ivalaine @GregTHR not enough data? What about these 9000+ observations? http://t.co/a0smDdR6U7
.@Ivalaine @GregTHR not enough data? What about these 9000+ observations? http://t.co/a0smDdR6U7
RT @ChefAJ22: @markgirlfelisa @SenBlumenthal scientists know what #ecigs emit and 0 harm to bystanders. Read this study http://t.co/qHD7sn…
A clinical study on e-cigs as a healthy alternative to smoking. #Vape http://t.co/uAa8VibcSv
RT @ChefAJ22: Scientists know what's in #ecigs why doesn't senator research before making false statements? http://t.co/qHD7snO5DJ https://…
Scientists know what's in #ecigs why doesn't senator research before making false statements? http://t.co/qHD7snO5DJ https://t.co/n6xOrKkIYR
@markgirlfelisa @SenBlumenthal scientists know what #ecigs emit and 0 harm to bystanders. Read this study http://t.co/qHD7snO5DJ
@RPS_Stakeholder @stuart180 @BoatingFuzzy @WelshLibDems Risks? http://t.co/fNZg4SQmuH negligible!
.@PositiveEnerG but there's lots of evidence #vapor is #harmless to users & bystanders http://t.co/a0smDdR6U7 http://t.co/P2AxvXeAZj #ecigs
.@PositiveEnerG but there's lots of evidence #vapor is #harmless to users & bystanders http://t.co/a0smDdR6U7 http://t.co/P2AxvXeAZj #ecigs
.@PositiveEnerG but there's lots of evidence #vapor is #harmless to users & bystanders http://t.co/a0smDdR6U7 http://t.co/P2AxvXeAZj #ecigs
@lrankerNEWS @BrendanJensen 1/2 The most comprehensive look at the data by Dr. Burstyn of Drexel U is here: http://t.co/jHAWjlm1EM
@DiODoherty Oh but we do. See http://t.co/BOoEmaqQ08 for the lowdown on vapour chemistry and toxicology. What do you think?
No qualifications needed to present evidence http://t.co/a0smDdR6U7 but just in case you're wondering about mine http://t.co/8L9MSdB2n1
No qualifications needed to present evidence http://t.co/a0smDdR6U7 but just in case you're wondering about mine http://t.co/8L9MSdB2n1
No qualifications needed to present evidence http://t.co/a0smDdR6U7 but just in case you're wondering about mine http://t.co/8L9MSdB2n1
No qualifications needed to present evidence http://t.co/a0smDdR6U7 but just in case you're wondering about mine http://t.co/8L9MSdB2n1
@trixywh @K_d_a7 @MarkLeno science says no harm to bystanders with e-cig emmisions and NOT smoke. http://t.co/x7Ccqyafek
@DrNinaRadcliff There is no harm to bystanders with #ecigs please read http://t.co/x7Ccqyafek #notblowingsmoke
@DrNinaRadcliff There is no harm to bystanders with #ecigs please read http://t.co/x7Ccqyafek #notblowingsmoke
.@GregGutfeldShow I have read the studies, no harm to bystanders with vapor http://t.co/x7Ccqyafek has .@DrNinaRadcliff read? #ecigs
.@GregGutfeldShow I have read the studies, no harm to bystanders with vapor http://t.co/x7Ccqyafek has .@DrNinaRadcliff read? #ecigs
.@GregGutfeldShow I have read the studies, no harm to bystanders with vapor http://t.co/x7Ccqyafek has .@DrNinaRadcliff read? #ecigs
.@GregGutfeldShow I have read the studies, no harm to bystanders with vapor http://t.co/x7Ccqyafek has .@DrNinaRadcliff read? #ecigs
.@GregGutfeldShow I have read the studies, no harm to bystanders with vapor http://t.co/x7Ccqyafek has .@DrNinaRadcliff read? #ecigs
@DrNinaRadcliff There is no harm to bystanders with #ecigs please read http://t.co/x7Ccqyafek #notblowingsmoke
@pr3sidentspence has anyone shown you this study yet? http://t.co/v97MYsUx9e - one of the largest so far done.
@pr3sidentspence http://t.co/AGiQ3rha3t This is the most complete study/research on indoor vaping. Free PDF download.
@pr3sidentspence here ya go. http://t.co/AGiQ3rha3t <-- Study
#NotBlowingSmoke Systematic review of what the chemistry of contaminants in #ecigs http://t.co/sUJCQaapgk #bmcpublichealth
#NotBlowingSmoke Systematic review of what the chemistry of contaminants in #ecigs http://t.co/sUJCQaapgk #bmcpublichealth
#NotBlowingSmoke Systematic review of what the chemistry of contaminants in #ecigs http://t.co/sUJCQaapgk #bmcpublichealth
#NotBlowingSmoke Systematic review of what the chemistry of contaminants in #ecigs http://t.co/sUJCQaapgk #bmcpublichealth
#NotBlowingSmoke Systematic review of what the chemistry of contaminants in #ecigs http://t.co/sUJCQaapgk #bmcpublichealth
@johnhopkin67530 @Howell4KS start here! http://t.co/ZTkweCMJ63
.@DrHealthnut @WebMD Here it is - http://t.co/FWB7J0XSx2
@DrHealthnut http://t.co/v97MYsUx9e. Suggest you read. :-)
.@NathanLee Plenty of research out there http://t.co/NZahd8bYoO http://t.co/DgAsol3K6D http://t.co/NteabScbRf
STUDY: "Systematic review of what the chemistry of contaminants in electronic cigarettes tells us about health risks" http://t.co/2lJzmJA0VM
@carlvphillips it has been published on the website now http://t.co/ItmU0CaNOU
@Eric_Ke_Collins @Sho2daPan @K_d_a7 @paigemacp those are the only constituents of any concern tho. The rest is water http://t.co/a0smDdR6U7
@fliss59 @pascalmeier74 @CaeruleanSea @guardian If you're concerned re effect to bystanders have a look at this: http://t.co/Op43yEA6Ye
.@abcnewsCanberra Plenty of evidence there's no such thing as "second-hand e-cigarette vapours" http://t.co/NZahd8bYoO #Lie
Drexel University Study menemukan bahwa tidak ditemukannya bahaya langsung pada perokok pasif rokok elektrik http://t.co/cxlOSo0gHf
@MattMumford @RobC_UK @anImaginaryEcho lots of science suggests they're low risk, here's one: http://t.co/Mqrz27PbcA
@euroalexb @mwarhurst and the levels of 'something's in 2nd hand vape are also considered safe - http://t.co/FWB7J0XSx2
@mwarhurst @CostaCoffee The best estimate is no measureable risk http://t.co/FWB7J0XSx2 (also, they aren't smoked, nothing gets burnt)
@HealthEqualGrp @ecigaretteforum http://t.co/v97MYsUx9e "Exposures of bystanders ... pose no apparent concern.".
@RoswellPark @ECigzz http://t.co/v97MYsUx9e, and your point is?
@RoswellPark @ECigzz http://t.co/v97MYsUx9e, and your point is?
Systematic review of what the chemistry of contaminants in e-cigarettes tell us about health risks http://t.co/9ZqEaruu6a #vaping2015
Systematic review of what the chemistry of contaminants in e-cigarettes tell us about health risks http://t.co/9ZqEaruu6a #vaping2015
Systematic review of what the chemistry of contaminants in e-cigarettes tell us about health risks http://t.co/9ZqEaruu6a #vaping2015
BMC Public Health | Abstract | Peering through the mist: systematic review of... http://t.co/7nmDOcR6bS #trustedsolution #lunarroverusa
@NB1126 science says dad is wrong, but respect for your father is the right thing. http://t.co/qHD7snwuf9
@philipdepalo @HorseshoeBmore only it does NOT affect your health. http://t.co/qHD7snwuf9 read the peer reviewed study.
@philipdepalo @HorseshoeBmore Read this study http://t.co/qHD7snwuf9 no harm to bystanders with #ecigs they are renormalizing quitting.
@BigVapingNunga @BrianCBock @JennyMcCarthy @vapeshops and no harm to bystanders http://t.co/qHD7snwuf9 #science
no harm to bystanders with #ecigs #notblowingsmoke http://t.co/qHD7snwuf9
no harm to bystanders with #ecigs #notblowingsmoke http://t.co/qHD7snwuf9
no harm to bystanders with #ecigs #notblowingsmoke http://t.co/qHD7snwuf9
no harm to bystanders with #ecigs #notblowingsmoke http://t.co/qHD7snwuf9
no harm to bystanders with #ecigs #notblowingsmoke http://t.co/qHD7snwuf9
@BigVapingNunga @BrianCBock @JennyMcCarthy @vapeshops and no harm to bystanders http://t.co/qHD7snwuf9 #science
@KristiFoulk @Surgeon_General Don't believe everything you read in the media #vapor is harmless to bystanders: http://t.co/KaTDRkxJ5T
.@VoicesofPH #ecigs normalize #quitting and no harm to bystanders. http://t.co/qHD7snwuf9 #BigVapor #BigVaping #notblowingsmoke
.@VoicesofPH #ecigs normalize #quitting and no harm to bystanders. http://t.co/qHD7snwuf9 #BigVapor #BigVaping #notblowingsmoke
.@VoicesofPH #ecigs normalize #quitting and no harm to bystanders. http://t.co/qHD7snwuf9 #BigVapor #BigVaping #notblowingsmoke
.@VoicesofPH #ecigs normalize #quitting and no harm to bystanders. http://t.co/qHD7snwuf9 #BigVapor #BigVaping #notblowingsmoke
.@VoicesofPH #ecigs normalize #quitting and no harm to bystanders. http://t.co/qHD7snwuf9 #BigVapor #BigVaping #notblowingsmoke
.@VoicesofPH #ecigs normalize #quitting and no harm to bystanders. http://t.co/qHD7snwuf9 #BigVapor #BigVaping #notblowingsmoke
@Wulf684 @RobbieWaldie @rivm Niet mijn artikel, dit ook niet http://t.co/4venYS9GBZ
@ry4nlindsay Full inclusion marks the end for vapeshops. There is no good scientific justification for that http://t.co/4venYS9GBZ 1/2
@ry4nlindsay Full inclusion marks the end for vapeshops. There is no good scientific justification for that http://t.co/4venYS9GBZ 1/2
.@TobaccoPrev #ecigs saved my life from tobacco and no harm to bystanders http://t.co/qHD7snwuf9 I no longer smoke.
.@pambartha reputable researchers tell us there is no harm to bystanders and no smoke produced. http://t.co/qHD7snwuf9 #ecigs
@TobaccoFreeFin @WCTOH2015 There is no lack of evidence http://t.co/4venYS9GBZ #WCTOH2015 #ecigssavelives #harmreduction
A good support article on vaping http://t.co/vg333yCw0g
.@Maimzini @BenDenny To bystanders?http://t.co/dFrsyA1MOA For users, vaping doesn't need to be 'safe' to save millions of lives.
.@Maimzini @BenDenny To bystanders?http://t.co/dFrsyA1MOA For users, vaping doesn't need to be 'safe' to save millions of lives.
.@Maimzini @BenDenny To bystanders?http://t.co/dFrsyA1MOA For users, vaping doesn't need to be 'safe' to save millions of lives.
.@kgarrettCHIP Nicotine harmful? So don't use patches and gums? what level r the other pollutants? http://t.co/qHD7snwuf9
.@kgarrettCHIP Nicotine harmful? So don't use patches and gums? what level r the other pollutants? http://t.co/qHD7snwuf9
.@WeberMorganHD .@standardex @utahvapers #ecigs are magnitudes safer than tobacco. http://t.co/qHD7snwuf9
@DePcan @RTLnieuws Ha een wetenschappelijke bron! Ik heb een relevantere.http://t.co/uBlWKrg2wT
Study finds zero harm to bystanders. #ecigarettes #ecigs http://t.co/qHD7snwuf9