@WestSydHealth https://t.co/ACpPLEmA4p https://t.co/6dExGQc7uv https://t.co/ln6d0joz5W https://t.co/j0QV4rKWrG Th real question is have your read any scientific studies? Or just regurgitate press releases from NGOs that are full of shit?
@AngelJustice121 @GrimmGreen Here's another study https://t.co/WFh1nLgabo https://t.co/v0MRzpR4Bn
@AngelJustice121 @DanielleTHR I also apologize for sounding condescending, it's not my intention. Science matters. "There was no evidence of potential for exposures of e-cig users to contaminants that are associated with risk to health at a level that wo
@LNKhealth I know what's in my vape. It's crystal clear that you do not. You should refrain from commenting on something you obviously don't understand. https://t.co/6K0GvXWz9J
RT @TheCSVSC: @KalbacherA Believe it or not, in some areas of the world, even an extremely clouded out vape shop has cleaner air to breathe…
@KalbacherA Believe it or not, in some areas of the world, even an extremely clouded out vape shop has cleaner air to breathe than the "fresh air" right outside the shop. This systematic reviews shows that. https://t.co/BNlptRBXNM
@LungNE This systematic reviews shows, that some cloudy vape shops, where you could barely see eachother, were safer to breathe in, than the "fresh air" right outside the shop. https://t.co/mRegkpDdLP
@GrantChampions False. How many cases of popcorn lung have been associated with vaping after 15 years of use by millions of people? If your answer is higher than zero, you're incorrect. There is no secondhand smoke because there is no smoke. https://t.c
RT @DarthMods: @FDATobacco Ecigs have no harmful 2nd hand vape. https://t.co/LiOxvoo7CL
@mentorpozhegu @CMR9271 @ParentsvsVape This systematic review of many many Air Quality Standard tests shows that is some vape shops that were so cloudy you could barely see the person in front of you, was safer to breathe than the "fresh" air outside you t
RT @DarthMods: @NSlung Systematic review for 2nd hand vape aka Air Quality Standard tests, showed that in some cloudy vape shops where it w…
RT @DarthMods: @NSlung Systematic review for 2nd hand vape aka Air Quality Standard tests, showed that in some cloudy vape shops where it w…
RT @DarthMods: @NSlung Systematic review for 2nd hand vape aka Air Quality Standard tests, showed that in some cloudy vape shops where it w…
@StefanDidak You'll find many here. https://t.co/1lRpmtvgU0 Burstyn's Peering Through the Mist essentially attests to this b/c much e-liquid at the time largely used Chinese nicotine. https://t.co/XwBwrU1W1a
@ChaunceyGardner Jico these are the 'offensive' links https://t.co/ASIbkdskgT via PHE https://t.co/yU6wCaOyYh < Burstyn https://t.co/THh4VOoUyB via @mbsiegel
RT @DarthMods: @canlung The story is, it is safer to breathe in then some "fresh air" right outside the cloudy vape shop. The evidence do…
RT @DarthMods: @canlung The story is, it is safer to breathe in then some "fresh air" right outside the cloudy vape shop. The evidence do…
RT @DarthMods: @CalNcpc Another absolute LIE. Real air quality sampling shows air inside cloudy shops were safer to breathe than the "fresh…
RT @DarthMods: @CalNcpc Another absolute LIE. Real air quality sampling shows air inside cloudy shops were safer to breathe than the "fresh…
RT @DarthMods: @CalNcpc Another absolute LIE. Real air quality sampling shows air inside cloudy shops were safer to breathe than the "fresh…
RT @DarthMods: @MarcGunther @ProfGlantz 2nd hand vape in clouded out vape shops still safer to breathe than the "fresh" air outside the sho…
RT @DarthMods: @MarcGunther @ProfGlantz 2nd hand vape in clouded out vape shops still safer to breathe than the "fresh" air outside the sho…
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: Vapor dissipates extremely fast and doesn’t cause harm to bystanders. In essence the vapor is self clearing. https://t.c…
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: Vapor dissipates extremely fast and doesn’t cause harm to bystanders. In essence the vapor is self clearing. https://t.c…
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: Vapor dissipates extremely fast and doesn’t cause harm to bystanders. In essence the vapor is self clearing. https://t.c…
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: Vapor dissipates extremely fast and doesn’t cause harm to bystanders. In essence the vapor is self clearing. https://t.c…
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: Vapor dissipates extremely fast and doesn’t cause harm to bystanders. In essence the vapor is self clearing. https://t.c…
Vapor dissipates extremely fast and doesn’t cause harm to bystanders. In essence the vapor is self clearing. https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj #ClearTheVapor
@VapingTo @KnowNicotine @NYSMom4Kiddos @StanfordTPT @ProfGlantz @petervemerson @EHolubowich @KulikovUNIATF @DrSaraSiddiqui1 @Biebert It has been tested and studied. This is from 2014. That’s how out of date your misinformation is. https://t.co/WFh1nLxLzY
RT @DarthMods: @smoking_asthma There is LOTS of evidence. Some clouded out vape shops came out SAFER to breathe than the air outside the sh…
RT @Globalvapenews: @LanceChurchill more papers about this subject: https://t.co/LvBi8OC9CI (conclusion: unlikely to be a risk) and https:/…
RT @Globalvapenews: @LanceChurchill more papers about this subject: https://t.co/LvBi8OC9CI (conclusion: unlikely to be a risk) and https:/…
RT @Globalvapenews: @LanceChurchill more papers about this subject: https://t.co/LvBi8OC9CI (conclusion: unlikely to be a risk) and https:/…
@LanceChurchill more papers about this subject: https://t.co/LvBi8OC9CI (conclusion: unlikely to be a risk) and https://t.co/xXsM7vyPBW (about 93.8% inhaled nicotine is retained and not a part of exhaled vapor)
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: Vaping doesn’t pose harm to bystanders https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
@FOX10Phoenix Nonsensical, vaping doesn’t harm others https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: Vaping doesn’t pose harm to bystanders https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
Vaping doesn’t pose harm to bystanders https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
By the way @DrKeithRoach good study for you https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: Science says that vaping doesn’t pose a threat to bystanders. Government should allow local businesses to decide if they…
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: Science says that vaping doesn’t pose a threat to bystanders. Government should allow local businesses to decide if they…
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: Science says that vaping doesn’t pose a threat to bystanders. Government should allow local businesses to decide if they…
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: Science says that vaping doesn’t pose a threat to bystanders. Government should allow local businesses to decide if they…
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: Science says that vaping doesn’t pose a threat to bystanders. Government should allow local businesses to decide if they…
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: Science says that vaping doesn’t pose a threat to bystanders. Government should allow local businesses to decide if they…
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: Science says that vaping doesn’t pose a threat to bystanders. Government should allow local businesses to decide if they…
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: Science says that vaping doesn’t pose a threat to bystanders. Government should allow local businesses to decide if they…
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: Science says that vaping doesn’t pose a threat to bystanders. Government should allow local businesses to decide if they…
Science says that vaping doesn’t pose a threat to bystanders. Government should allow local businesses to decide if they allow vaping or don’t allow. Give me liberty! https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj #MoLeg #WeVapeWeVote
@ChrisDunkerLJS Looks like studies are mixed, but generally conclude that second-hand vaping isn't awful. Not particularly harmful: https://t.co/kfdqcjLu5R Not particularly harmful: https://t.co/cdsimjBkyA Maybe harmful: https://t.co/6EJSeCfWlx
RT @brainyfurball: @HannaMuses @FCTCofficial This https://t.co/aC4oFnhcIw and here are the studies the article is based on... https://t.co/…
@HannaMuses @FCTCofficial This https://t.co/aC4oFnhcIw and here are the studies the article is based on... https://t.co/h1BUcMa3xT https://t.co/JhuGcYWmJC
@LikesLurking @eugenegu https://t.co/cmQPJcoxbn Try this one if you need specific proof of something. Not sure whatelse i can do to prove it to you. Maybe you can answer a question for me when were asthma inhalers first introduced. Because pg has been used
@NRPublicHealth "There was no evidence of potential for exposures of e-cigarette users to contaminants that are associated with risk to health at a level that would warrant attention if it were an involuntary workplace exposures." https://t.co/RRACBY1DCH
@hsfi Huuhaata. Sähkötupakan terveyshaittoja on etsitty intensiivisesti 10 vuotta. Mitään kliinisesti merkittävää ei ole löytynyt. Ensimmäinen systemaattinen kirjallisuuskatsus sähkötupakka-aerosolin potentiaalisista haitoista vuodelta 2014 (riskit mitättö
@healthaiminc @NEJM @cdc @wef @WHO @ilo @UNICEF @UN @UNDP Your intuition is completely wrong. https://t.co/WeLL0LZSJU https://t.co/az8MCPVXCX No dangerous levels of exposure to any hazardous chemical. https://t.co/sZ9gcGSa3U No identified health risks of p
RT @HazeVapeCo: #vapinginfo #vaping #vapingisntsmoking #vapefacts Peering through the mist: systematic review of what the chemistry of con…
#vapinginfo #vaping #vapingisntsmoking #vapefacts Peering through the mist: systematic review of what the chemistry of contaminants in electronic cigarettes tells us about health risks https://t.co/1snBt8sPYE
RT @HazeVapeCo: Peering through the mist: systematic review of what the chemistry of contaminants in electronic cigarettes tells us about h…
Peering through the mist: systematic review of what the chemistry of contaminants in electronic cigarettes tells us about health risks https://t.co/1snBt8sPYE
RT @queenbee4910: Some more information for you. @NYSMom4Kiddos #WeVapeWeVote #VapeLegion #vapingsaveslives #vape2live #vapeprohib…
RT @queenbee4910: Some more information for you. @NYSMom4Kiddos #WeVapeWeVote #VapeLegion #vapingsaveslives #vape2live #vapeprohib…
Some more information for you. @NYSMom4Kiddos #WeVapeWeVote #VapeLegion #vapingsaveslives #vape2live #vapeprohibition #Liberty #FreedomOfChoice
@Testaankoop @ivomechels @SNovember_TA @jkelovuori Tenslotte, wat betreft de relatieve veiligheid van vapen versus roken, nog deze twee “klassiekers”. Opnieuw: oordeel vooral zelf. https://t.co/OvmnI2skRw https://t.co/OcvR7YdDvK 5/5
@CNET Stop. Vaping doesn’t warrant any concern of harm to bystanders. https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
RT @MayarRawrr: @E__Alqahtani فيه جم دراسه مسوينها بين العادية و الڤيب النتيجه انه لأنه الڤيب مافيه توباكو فهو أكثر امان من العادية لانه ال…
@E__Alqahtani فيه جم دراسه مسوينها بين العادية و الڤيب النتيجه انه لأنه الڤيب مافيه توباكو فهو أكثر امان من العادية لانه التوباكو عادة يكون وياه آش و تار و اول اوكسيد الكربون الي يضر بالصحة https://t.co/ciam0NKBNl
@_Storky_ @HolmalahtiJussi Ensimmäinen höyryn hengittämisen turvallisuutta koskeva systemaattinen kirjallisuuskatsaus jo vuodelta 2014. https://t.co/96qIvZDcqW https://t.co/LWgPIJl3l3
@SimonHarrisTD An early review from 2014 Peering through the mist: systematic review of what the chemistry of contaminants in electronic cigarettes tells us about health risks. Contaminants too low to have major effects, but main components of juice could
For an example of how to properly compare e-cigarette emissions to workplace exposure limits see: https://t.co/XwBwrU1W1a
@Surgeon_General @usnews Absolutely misleading and inaccurate. While pushing these fabricated fear based narratives, smokers are increasingly believing that vaping is more harmful. Lives are being lost unnecessarily. https://t.co/2YbwkUSLwC https://t.co/m
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: There is absolutely no reason to ban vaping in public. Vaping warrants no concern to bystanders. Science should guide p…
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: There is absolutely no reason to ban vaping in public. Vaping warrants no concern to bystanders. Science should guide p…
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: There is absolutely no reason to ban vaping in public. Vaping warrants no concern to bystanders. Science should guide p…
There is absolutely no reason to ban vaping in public. Vaping warrants no concern to bystanders. Science should guide policy not ideology. #vaping https://t.co/1WE2obvucR
@VapingTo @ShopMallofGA @ParentsvsVape @NYSMom4Kiddos @KnowNicotine @StanfordTPT @GwinnettDaily @GwinnettCitizen @GwinnettNewsNow Vaping warrants no concern to bystanders. Science should guide policy not ideology. https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: Study finds vaping doesn’t warrant concern of harm to bystanders https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj #vapingChat https://t.co/ryDmRaK…
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: I’d ask @KeishaBottoms to veto the bill. Vaping should not be included because it doesn’t harm bystanders. https://t.co/1…
@BradyHalbleibTV Evidence shows vaping doesn’t warrant concern to bystanders. https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: Smoking was banned indoors because science said there was harm via second hand smoke. We don’t legislate to ban because…
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: Smoking was banned indoors because science said there was harm via second hand smoke. We don’t legislate to ban because…
I’d ask @KeishaBottoms to veto the bill. Vaping should not be included because it doesn’t harm bystanders. https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj