Smoking was banned indoors because science said there was harm via second hand smoke. We don’t legislate to ban because others don’t like something or are offended. Science says vaping doesn’t warrant concern of harm via second hand steam. https://t.
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: @h_middlekauff Correct https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: Study finds vaping doesn’t warrant concern of harm to bystanders https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj #vapingChat https://t.co/ryDmRaK…
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: Study finds vaping doesn’t warrant concern of harm to bystanders https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj #vapingChat https://t.co/ryDmRaK…
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: Study finds vaping doesn’t warrant concern of harm to bystanders https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj #vapingChat https://t.co/ryDmRaK…
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: @h_middlekauff Correct https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: Study finds vaping doesn’t warrant concern of harm to bystanders https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj #vapingChat https://t.co/ryDmRaK…
@ACCinTouch Not at all concerning https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
Study finds vaping doesn’t warrant concern of harm to bystanders https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj #vapingChat
RT @Lollylulubes: @XimenaLevander @jkelovuori Peering through the mist: health risks https://t.co/YxnC60ADII Cancer risk in vapers is very…
@StuffIKnew @ceo4105 @jacobgrier "there is no evidence that vaping produces inhalable exposures to contaminants of the aerosol that would warrant health concerns" https://t.co/WeLL0LZSJU "to date, there have been no identified health risks of passive vapi
RT @SetNicFree: @CardioCarll @aatclc @BySheilaKaplan Aldehydes are at levels below occupational safety limits (https://t.co/XwBwrU1W1a), WH…
@CardioCarll @aatclc @BySheilaKaplan Aldehydes are at levels below occupational safety limits (https://t.co/XwBwrU1W1a), WHO indoor air safety limits (Discussion here: https://t.co/XdPUYetkty) and far below tobacco smoke levels. Newer devices, with less un
@Josh__Robillard @ottawahealth @KeithEgli @OttawaBylaw Not a concern for harm https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
@44Swed @CNN You certainly seem like someone who as well researched all the science Mr. Trump Gif person. But, let’s review just in case you might have made a mistake https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
@doug_lee42 @SuckMyMod @featherbear15 There are no second hand effects. There is no smoke! https://t.co/p2VjZBszJc
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: @LungAssociation Study says second hand vapor doesn’t warrant any concern of harm to bystanders https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
RT @bekijane: Do not trust any organisation that ignores actual science. I don't know why they are ignoring science, but it can't be for an…
Do not trust any organisation that ignores actual science. I don't know why they are ignoring science, but it can't be for any GOOD reasons. Every point they make here was rebutted years ago. https://t.co/SZtFmq1g4d
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: @LungAssociation Study says second hand vapor doesn’t warrant any concern of harm to bystanders https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: @LungAssociation Study says second hand vapor doesn’t warrant any concern of harm to bystanders https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: @LungAssociation Study says second hand vapor doesn’t warrant any concern of harm to bystanders https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: @LungAssociation Study says second hand vapor doesn’t warrant any concern of harm to bystanders https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
RT @fatcatvapor: @LungAssociation Passive ecigarette vapor poses virtually no threat at all to bystanders. None. It's been demonstrated by…
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: @LungAssociation Study says second hand vapor doesn’t warrant any concern of harm to bystanders https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
@LungAssociation Study says second hand vapor doesn’t warrant any concern of harm to bystanders https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
RT @monkinsane: @ShereefElnahal  ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄| | THE ORIGINAL | | TWEET WAS MADE | | BY A DIRTY DIRTY | | SMEAR MERCHANT |…
@MDAndersonNews The people who made those recommendations are lucky that most smokers will just ignore their offensive comments. Why don't you ask smokers what would work? Btw vape ≠ smoke. You should know this already. https://t.co/6K0GvXWz9J https://t
RT @monkinsane: @ShereefElnahal  ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄| | THE ORIGINAL | | TWEET WAS MADE | | BY A DIRTY DIRTY | | SMEAR MERCHANT |…
@ShereefElnahal  ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄| | THE ORIGINAL | | TWEET WAS MADE | | BY A DIRTY DIRTY | | SMEAR MERCHANT | | _________ | (\__/) || (•ㅅ•) || / づ Read for Yourself: https://t.co/WQmvH1dbnL https://t.co/JLlMn3k3jL https://t.co/axdH
Vaping doesn’t pose harm to bystanders #ATS2019 https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: @DubaiEye1038FM Vaping doesn’t cause any harm to bystanders https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: @DubaiEye1038FM Vaping doesn’t cause any harm to bystanders https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: @DubaiEye1038FM Vaping doesn’t cause any harm to bystanders https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: @DubaiEye1038FM Vaping doesn’t cause any harm to bystanders https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
@DubaiEye1038FM Vaping doesn’t cause any harm to bystanders https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
@helen_it @VaperNt @WordsByFergus @ChaunceyGardner @Olfella56 I’ll just leave this here: https://t.co/d2K7DOhDDJ
@sarah_0n @TackshsProject @enspbrussels @stvfdz ... and it's harmless. https://t.co/oh7yb6Jenu
This study confirmed that there is no evidence that #vaping produces inhalable exposures to contaminants of the aerosol that would warrant health concerns by the standards that are used to ensure safety of workplaces. #vapingsaveslives https://t.co/GyUcyGn
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: @rapides_trf There’s absolutely no harm to bystanders via vaping https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
@rapides_trf There’s absolutely no harm to bystanders via vaping https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
@MeghanCollie vaping doesn’t warrant harm to bystanders https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
No mention of this study from Igor Burstyn of the Drexel Dornsife School of Public Health, concluding: "there is no evidence that vaping produces inhalable exposures to contaminants of the aerosol that would warrant health concerns..." https://t.co/zCjyUK
RT @AlexWodak: Conclusions of extensive review literature of risk ingredients of #vaping aerosol: 'Current state of knowledge about chemist…
RT @AlexWodak: Conclusions of extensive review literature of risk ingredients of #vaping aerosol: 'Current state of knowledge about chemist…
Conclusions of extensive review literature of risk ingredients of #vaping aerosol: 'Current state of knowledge about chemistry of liquids and aerosols associated with electronic cigarettes indicates that there is no evidence that vaping produces inhalable
@Lophophanes @ClimateAdam 1) Not promoted to non smokers AT ALL, and even if it were, there wouldn't be an issue. See:: https://t.co/o0vQqGinA0 2) Vapour is approximately harmless to bystanders, and we've known this since at least 2014: https://t.co/SZtFmq
@BarehamDave 1. With time science and smart regulation will continue to reduce these. 2. These should be quantified. https://t.co/XwBwrU1W1a
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: @emlywhite @ClearWayMN @LaurieHalverson Vaping doesn’t warrant any concern to bystanders. Let the business owners decide…
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: Vaping warrants no harm to bystanders finds study. No reason for the government to ban indoors when business owners can d…
Vaping warrants no harm to bystanders finds study. No reason for the government to ban indoors when business owners can decide. https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj #MnLeg #vaping
@emlywhite @ClearWayMN @LaurieHalverson Vaping doesn’t warrant any concern to bystanders. Let the business owners decide what policy they want to set. https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
@brainsondrugs @SGottliebFDA There isn’t any smoke. https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
@Tigershark94 @RayTruant @Elaxisfae @runscreamingly There's more evidence on the safety of #vaping than for any other consumer product; coming from both the toxicology perspective (1) and from real-world studies of users (2). Refs👇 1. https://t.co/4zULa0oY
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: @careenkh @Vapingit @SGottliebFDA I’ve seen babies in restaurants that allow SMOKING. Wouldn’t you rather their parents…
@careenkh @Vapingit @SGottliebFDA I’ve seen babies in restaurants that allow SMOKING. Wouldn’t you rather their parents use vapor products? Vaping doesn’t warrant concern to bystanders https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
@Mix957GR It's understandable that school officials want to stop vaping by students, but it's unethical & counterproductive to lie to them to achieve this goal. re diacetyl: https://t.co/1hfWZDwyEt re chemicals: https://t.co/6K0GvXWz9J re gateway: h
@RDangler @Jake2001 @VapinGreek @VaporLawyer @GregTHR Vaping doesn’t warrant concern of harm to bystanders https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
@RDangler @stuart180 @VaporLawyer @GregTHR @VapinGreek @SGottliebFDA Mate, you're breathing in things from other people's lungs all the time. And as for that empirical evidence: https://t.co/oh7yb6Jenu
@bbec_vet @HarvardHealth Sure, that's all true. But we need to look at the magnitude of effects compared to smoking. Typical exposures of irritants are at levels below occupational exposure limits. https://t.co/xCnUMIXYO4
@LungAssociation Science says you’re lying https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
RT @Barry_Strak: @gershuni @FreeEqualIL @davidk07 @YehudahGlick @cabel_eitan @EyalBenReuven @RonnyLinder @LifeRivlin @midaat הכימיקלים באיד…
@gershuni @FreeEqualIL @davidk07 @YehudahGlick @cabel_eitan @EyalBenReuven @RonnyLinder @LifeRivlin @midaat הכימיקלים באידים קיימים ברמות נמוכות מהמותרות בתקנות בטיחות לחשיפה תעסוקתית, שלא לדבר על טכנולוגיות עדכניות (כולל ג'ול) עם בקרת טמפרטורה למניעת יציר
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: @CityStrategist @PHE_uk There’s no concern of passive vaping. https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
“There was no evidence of potential for exposures of e-cigarette users to contaminants that are associated with risk to health at a level that would warrant attention if it were an involuntary workplace exposures.” https://t.co/DCWssFxcKK
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: @CityStrategist @PHE_uk There’s no concern of passive vaping. https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
@CityStrategist @PHE_uk There’s no concern of passive vaping. https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
RT @balbecdaze: @sucharitakher We've known that is false for ages. https://t.co/oh7yb6Jenu
@sucharitakher We've known that is false for ages. https://t.co/oh7yb6Jenu
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: Professor Igor Burstyn of Drexel University finds “second hand” vapor warrants no concern to bystanders @nobisha https:/…
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: Professor Igor Burstyn of Drexel University finds “second hand” vapor warrants no concern to bystanders @nobisha https:/…
Professor Igor Burstyn of Drexel University finds “second hand” vapor warrants no concern to bystanders @nobisha https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj #vaping
@nobisha Vapor isn’t a cause of concern to bystanders, stop fear mongering https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
RT @phil_w888: @mch_childrens 1. Vaping isn't a type of smoking 2. "Exposures of bystanders are likely to be orders of magnitude less, and…
@mch_childrens 1. Vaping isn't a type of smoking 2. "Exposures of bystanders are likely to be orders of magnitude less, and thus pose no apparent concern" https://t.co/6K0GvXWz9J 3. "not regulated" isn't true https://t.co/7aZL4XwIjA 4. re side effects:
RT @phil_w888: Dear @calgarytransit, Nothing is burned when vaping. Vaping is not, as you say, smoking. Please join the real world and ack…
RT @phil_w888: Dear @calgarytransit, Nothing is burned when vaping. Vaping is not, as you say, smoking. Please join the real world and ack…
RT @phil_w888: Dear @calgarytransit, Nothing is burned when vaping. Vaping is not, as you say, smoking. Please join the real world and ack…
Dear @calgarytransit, Nothing is burned when vaping. Vaping is not, as you say, smoking. Please join the real world and acknowledge this. You are entitled to your policies, even if they are based on nothing more than ignorance & bigotry. Regards, Ph
@CorpLasCondes @LavinJoaquin Gracias por responder, sin embargo el motivo de su prohibición en plazas de su comuna es por el peligro hacia terceros, sin embargo, no hay evidencia de la existencia del vapeadores pasivo https://t.co/yhtwmHCTSz
Drexel University’s Igor Burstyn, a toxicology expert, concluded that there is no risk to bystanders breathing vapor. “Exposures of bystanders are likely to be orders of magnitude less, and thus pose no apparent concern,” wrote Burstyn. https://t.co/KnpAg8
RT @BRAVEmediaMO: Because science https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj https://t.co/jXRS0GUB3j
Because science https://t.co/1WE2obdTlj
RT @GrahamGords1001: @susanstanwix @toryboypierce @Hollis2Bryan @LBC https://t.co/anJGkrGOGX You are joking right? E-cigs have been subjec…