↓ Skip to main content

Impact of false-positive mammography on subsequent screening attendance and risk of cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research, October 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Impact of false-positive mammography on subsequent screening attendance and risk of cancer
Published in
Breast Cancer Research, October 2002
DOI 10.1186/bcr455
Authors

Jenny McCann, Diane Stockton, Sara Godward

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 65 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 23%
Student > Master 15 21%
Student > Bachelor 12 17%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 48%
Psychology 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Engineering 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 14 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2005.
All research outputs
#5,609,310
of 17,364,317 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#749
of 1,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,726
of 276,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,364,317 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.