↓ Skip to main content

Does Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound treatment repair articular cartilage injury? A rabbit model study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Does Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound treatment repair articular cartilage injury? A rabbit model study
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-36
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shan-Wei Yang, Chien-Lin Kuo, Shwu Jen Chang, Po-Chou Chen, Yen Ting Lin, Ioannis Manousakas, Shyh Ming Kuo

Abstract

Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) regiment has been used to treat fractures with non-union and to promote bone union in general. The effect of LIPUS on articular cartilage metabolism has been characterized. Yet, the effect of LIPUS to repair articular cartilage injury remains unclear in vivo.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 30%
Student > Master 5 17%
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Postgraduate 4 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 50%
Engineering 3 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Unspecified 2 7%
Materials Science 2 7%
Other 6 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2014.
All research outputs
#2,056,926
of 5,039,474 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#738
of 1,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,544
of 141,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#54
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,039,474 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 58th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,695 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.