| Title |
Adverse childhood experiences, psychosocial well-being and cognitive development among orphans and abandoned children in five low income countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-698x-14-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maya Escueta, Kathryn Whetten, Jan Ostermann, Karen O’Donnell, The Positive Outcomes for Orphans (POFO) Research Team |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 33% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 11% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 204 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 17% |
| Researcher | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 13% |
| Unknown | 52 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 47 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 28 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Unknown | 58 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2014.
All research outputs
#6,847,541
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,479
of 17,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,556
of 235,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#112
of 291 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 291 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.