↓ Skip to main content

Genome-wide association analysis of thirty one production, health, reproduction and body conformation traits in contemporary U.S. Holstein cows

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
344 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
257 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Genome-wide association analysis of thirty one production, health, reproduction and body conformation traits in contemporary U.S. Holstein cows
Published in
BMC Genomics, August 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-12-408
Pubmed ID
Authors

John B Cole, George R Wiggans, Li Ma, Tad S Sonstegard, Thomas J Lawlor, Brian A Crooker, Curtis P Van Tassell, Jing Yang, Shengwen Wang, Lakshmi K Matukumalli, Yang Da

Abstract

Genome-wide association analysis is a powerful tool for annotating phenotypic effects on the genome and knowledge of genes and chromosomal regions associated with dairy phenotypes is useful for genome and gene-based selection. Here, we report results of a genome-wide analysis of predicted transmitting ability (PTA) of 31 production, health, reproduction and body conformation traits in contemporary Holstein cows.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Colombia 3 1%
Uganda 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 242 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 22%
Student > Master 43 17%
Researcher 39 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 4%
Other 30 12%
Unknown 55 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 128 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 21 8%
Computer Science 5 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 66 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2011.
All research outputs
#15,233,109
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#6,657
of 10,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,342
of 120,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#43
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,605 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.