RT @Team_Blueprint: This echoes the past state of reporting within clinical systematic reviews, where historic poor reporting hampered thei…
This echoes the past state of reporting within clinical systematic reviews, where historic poor reporting hampered their quality and potentially limited their utility. https://t.co/nmsNWHTMpX
@wildscrutineer @v_woolf https://t.co/XD1ixA5g1h Discussion para 2!
RT @MedicalEvidence: Despite dissemination of guidelines, reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews are inconsistent: http…
RT @MedicalEvidence: Despite dissemination of guidelines, reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews are inconsistent: http…
RT @MedicalEvidence: Despite dissemination of guidelines, reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews are inconsistent: http…
RT @MedicalEvidence: Despite dissemination of guidelines, reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews are inconsistent: http…
RT @MedicalEvidence: Despite dissemination of guidelines, reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews are inconsistent: http…
RT @MedicalEvidence: Despite dissemination of guidelines, reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews are inconsistent: http…
RT @MedicalEvidence: Despite dissemination of guidelines, reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews are inconsistent: http…
RT @MedicalEvidence: Despite dissemination of guidelines, reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews are inconsistent: http…
Research quality is everyone's responsibility, it's all of us! #researchwaste #researchintegrity https://t.co/4ipDKU23hQ
RT @MedicalEvidence: Despite dissemination of guidelines, reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews are inconsistent: http…
Great review and results may intuitively make sense but I don't buy the data: Tables 2-5 present totals of apples and oranges https://t.co/pkv6mXE65a
RT @Zia_Julia: Methodological & reporting quality of #systematicreviews. We don't need 2 re-invent the wheel, just use it. @dmoher https://…
RT @MedicalEvidence: Despite dissemination of guidelines, reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews are inconsistent: http…
RT @MedicalEvidence: Despite dissemination of guidelines, reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews are inconsistent: http…
RT @MedicalEvidence: Despite dissemination of guidelines, reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews are inconsistent: http…
Despite dissemination of guidelines, reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews are inconsistent: https://t.co/lEdWXepgOQ
RT @Zia_Julia: Methodological & reporting quality of #systematicreviews. We don't need 2 re-invent the wheel, just use it. @dmoher https://…
RT @MedicalEvidence: Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality - Kusala Pussegoda &co via #SysRevsJ: https://t.co/…
RT @MedicalEvidence: Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality - Kusala Pussegoda &co via #SysRevsJ: https://t.co/…
Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality - Kusala Pussegoda &co via #SysRevsJ: https://t.co/lEdWXepgOQ @dmoher
RT @Zia_Julia: Methodological & reporting quality of #systematicreviews. We don't need 2 re-invent the wheel, just use it. @dmoher https://…
Methodological & reporting quality of #systematicreviews. We don't need 2 re-invent the wheel, just use it. @dmoher https://t.co/Hwnn3BA8Fd
RT @hildabast: Eek! 😬 A third of PRISMA items got <60% compliance in this study of studies of systematic reviews by @dmoher &co https://t.c…
RT @hildabast: Eek! 😬 A third of PRISMA items got <60% compliance in this study of studies of systematic reviews by @dmoher &co https://t.c…
Despite dissemination of guidelines, reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews are inconsistent. https://t.co/Hwh2kQ8tB3
RT @hildabast: Eek! 😬 A third of PRISMA items got <60% compliance in this study of studies of systematic reviews by @dmoher &co https://t.c…
RT @hildabast: Eek! 😬 A third of PRISMA items got <60% compliance in this study of studies of systematic reviews by @dmoher &co https://t.c…
RT @paulsutcliffewe: New paper: Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality .@dmoher @hildabast @EvidSynthTeam http…
Interesting paper - Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality https://t.co/wS9swHFQWb #sysrevsj
RT @paulsutcliffewe: New paper: Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality .@dmoher @hildabast @EvidSynthTeam http…
New paper: Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality .@dmoher @hildabast @EvidSynthTeam https://t.co/0RSlwxqov8
Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality https://t.co/wjmEN5aTxG #sysrevsj
RT @hildabast: Eek! 😬 A third of PRISMA items got <60% compliance in this study of studies of systematic reviews by @dmoher &co https://t.c…
RT @hildabast: Eek! 😬 A third of PRISMA items got <60% compliance in this study of studies of systematic reviews by @dmoher &co https://t.c…
RT @hildabast: Eek! 😬 A third of PRISMA items got <60% compliance in this study of studies of systematic reviews by @dmoher &co https://t.c…
RT @hildabast: Eek! 😬 A third of PRISMA items got <60% compliance in this study of studies of systematic reviews by @dmoher &co https://t.c…
RT @hildabast: Eek! 😬 A third of PRISMA items got <60% compliance in this study of studies of systematic reviews by @dmoher &co https://t.c…
RT @hildabast: Eek! 😬 A third of PRISMA items got <60% compliance in this study of studies of systematic reviews by @dmoher &co https://t.c…
RT @hildabast: Eek! 😬 A third of PRISMA items got <60% compliance in this study of studies of systematic reviews by @dmoher &co https://t.c…
RT @hildabast: Eek! 😬 A third of PRISMA items got <60% compliance in this study of studies of systematic reviews by @dmoher &co https://t.c…
RT @hildabast: Eek! 😬 A third of PRISMA items got <60% compliance in this study of studies of systematic reviews by @dmoher &co https://t.c…
RT @hildabast: Eek! 😬 A third of PRISMA items got <60% compliance in this study of studies of systematic reviews by @dmoher &co https://t.c…
RT @hildabast: Eek! 😬 A third of PRISMA items got <60% compliance in this study of studies of systematic reviews by @dmoher &co https://t.c…
RT @hildabast: Eek! 😬 A third of PRISMA items got <60% compliance in this study of studies of systematic reviews by @dmoher &co https://t.c…
RT @hildabast: Eek! 😬 A third of PRISMA items got <60% compliance in this study of studies of systematic reviews by @dmoher &co https://t.c…
RT @hildabast: Eek! 😬 A third of PRISMA items got <60% compliance in this study of studies of systematic reviews by @dmoher &co https://t.c…
RT @hildabast: Eek! 😬 A third of PRISMA items got <60% compliance in this study of studies of systematic reviews by @dmoher &co https://t.c…
RT @hildabast: Eek! 😬 A third of PRISMA items got <60% compliance in this study of studies of systematic reviews by @dmoher &co https://t.c…
Eek! 😬 A third of PRISMA items got <60% compliance in this study of studies of systematic reviews by @dmoher &co https://t.co/ZtnPZtinhQ https://t.co/HVqBruTGOk
Recently pub'd 2 articles on methodological & reporting quality of systematic reviews: https://t.co/M3ClO81Nav, https://t.co/aeAJzxDXyk