↓ Skip to main content

Chronic non-specific low back pain – sub-groups or a single mechanism?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
35 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
447 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Chronic non-specific low back pain – sub-groups or a single mechanism?
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, January 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-9-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benedict Martin Wand, Neil Edward O'Connell

Abstract

Low back pain is a substantial health problem and has subsequently attracted a considerable amount of research. Clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of a variety of interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain indicate limited effectiveness for most commonly applied interventions and approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 447 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 425 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 81 18%
Student > Bachelor 54 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 11%
Researcher 46 10%
Other 41 9%
Other 104 23%
Unknown 71 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 182 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 75 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 6%
Sports and Recreations 22 5%
Neuroscience 17 4%
Other 43 10%
Unknown 82 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,219,124
of 25,944,331 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#184
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,656
of 171,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,944,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.