↓ Skip to main content

Chronic non-specific low back pain – sub-groups or a single mechanism?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
35 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
446 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Chronic non-specific low back pain – sub-groups or a single mechanism?
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, January 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-9-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benedict Martin Wand, Neil Edward O'Connell

Abstract

Low back pain is a substantial health problem and has subsequently attracted a considerable amount of research. Clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of a variety of interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain indicate limited effectiveness for most commonly applied interventions and approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 446 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 424 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 82 18%
Student > Bachelor 56 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 11%
Researcher 45 10%
Other 42 9%
Other 104 23%
Unknown 67 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 182 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 77 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 6%
Sports and Recreations 23 5%
Neuroscience 16 4%
Other 44 10%
Unknown 78 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,174,837
of 25,246,334 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#179
of 4,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,632
of 169,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,246,334 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,384 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.