| Title |
Spontaneous feline mammary intraepithelial lesions as a model for human estrogen receptor- and progesterone receptor-negative breast lesions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2407-10-156 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giovanni P Burrai, Sulma I Mohammed, Margaret A Miller, Vincenzo Marras, Salvatore Pirino, Maria F Addis, Sergio Uzzau, Elisabetta Antuofermo |
| Abstract |
Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women. Intraepithelial lesions (IELs), such as usual ductal hyperplasia (UH), atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are risk factors that predict a woman's chance of developing invasive breast cancer. Therefore, a comparative study that establishes an animal model of pre-invasive lesions is needed for the development of preventative measures and effective treatment for both mammary IELs and tumors. The purpose of this study was to characterize the histologic and molecular features of feline mammary IELs and compare them with those in women. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 61 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 16 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 17 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 21 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2011.
All research outputs
#15,233,109
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#4,097
of 8,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,221
of 94,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#45
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,235 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.