↓ Skip to main content

One year follow-up of a pragmatic multi-centre randomised controlled trial of a group-based fatigue management programme (FACETS) for people with multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neurology, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
One year follow-up of a pragmatic multi-centre randomised controlled trial of a group-based fatigue management programme (FACETS) for people with multiple sclerosis
Published in
BMC Neurology, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2377-14-109
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter W Thomas, Sarah Thomas, Paula Kersten, Rosemary Jones, Vicky Slingsby, Alison Nock, Angela Davies Smith, Roger Baker, Kathleen T Galvin, Charles Hillier

Abstract

Fatigue is one of the most common and debilitating symptoms of multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim was to evaluate the effectiveness at 1-year follow-up of a manualised group-based programme ('FACETS') for managing MS-fatigue.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 87 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 21%
Researcher 18 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Student > Master 7 8%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 9 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 20%
Psychology 17 19%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 15 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2015.
All research outputs
#732,797
of 12,373,815 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#62
of 1,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,167
of 191,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,373,815 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.