RT @mpollock721: What do decision-makers think of rapid reviews? Willing to accept trade-offs between validity and speed, but validity of R…
RT @mpollock721: What do decision-makers think of rapid reviews? Willing to accept trade-offs between validity and speed, but validity of R…
RT @mpollock721: What do decision-makers think of rapid reviews? Willing to accept trade-offs between validity and speed, but validity of R…
RT @mpollock721: What do decision-makers think of rapid reviews? Willing to accept trade-offs between validity and speed, but validity of R…
RT @mpollock721: What do decision-makers think of rapid reviews? Willing to accept trade-offs between validity and speed, but validity of R…
What do decision-makers think of rapid reviews? Willing to accept trade-offs between validity and speed, but validity of RR's should still approach that of SR's. Excellent study by @ggartleh and colleagues. | https://t.co/NAGveBhAOE
Trading certainty for speed - how much uncertainty are decisionmakers and guideline developer... https://t.co/sBfSqJndf2 #bmcmedresmethodol
RT @iecsarg: #PaperIECS Rev. sistemáticas rápidas, ¿cuál es el nivel de riesgo que los decisores en salud toleran al usarlas? https://t.co/…
RT @iecsarg: #PaperIECS Rev. sistemáticas rápidas, ¿cuál es el nivel de riesgo que los decisores en salud toleran al usarlas? https://t.co/…
#PaperIECS Rev. sistemáticas rápidas, ¿cuál es el nivel de riesgo que los decisores en salud toleran al usarlas? https://t.co/PRUNEnwZTF https://t.co/kip1ELXOmY
RT @pash22: How much uncertainty r decisionmakers & guideline developers willing to accept when using rapid reviews https://t.co/cWoo1uZ3Ls
How much uncertainty r decisionmakers & guideline developers willing to accept when using rapid reviews https://t.co/cWoo1uZ3Ls
RT @cmsinnott: Decisionmakers expect validity of rapid reviews to come close to that of systematic reviews. https://t.co/H0SRWKzDfb #bmcmed…
RT @CochraneAT: How much uncertainty are decisionmakers willing to accept when using rapid reviews? New publication from our team https://t…
RT @cmsinnott: Decisionmakers expect validity of rapid reviews to come close to that of systematic reviews. https://t.co/H0SRWKzDfb #bmcmed…
RT @cmsinnott: Decisionmakers expect validity of rapid reviews to come close to that of systematic reviews. https://t.co/H0SRWKzDfb #bmcmed…
RT @cmsinnott: Decisionmakers expect validity of rapid reviews to come close to that of systematic reviews. https://t.co/H0SRWKzDfb #bmcmed…
RT @cmsinnott: Decisionmakers expect validity of rapid reviews to come close to that of systematic reviews. https://t.co/H0SRWKzDfb #bmcmed…
Decisionmakers expect validity of rapid reviews to come close to that of systematic reviews. https://t.co/H0SRWKzDfb #bmcmedresmethodol
RT @CochraneAT: How much uncertainty are decisionmakers willing to accept when using rapid reviews? New publication from our team https://t…
RT @CochraneAT: How much uncertainty are decisionmakers willing to accept when using rapid reviews? New publication from our team https://t…
RT @TammyJClifford: Trading certainty for speed - how much uncertainty are decisionmakers willing to accept when using rapid reviews? http…
RT @TammyJClifford: Trading certainty for speed - how much uncertainty are decisionmakers willing to accept when using rapid reviews? http…
RT @TammyJClifford: Trading certainty for speed - how much uncertainty are decisionmakers willing to accept when using rapid reviews? http…
RT @CMHealthLibrary: New study: How much uncertainty is acceptable in exchange for a rapid evidence-synthesis?https://t.co/uIgcaT4COZ #Evid…
Trading certainty for speed when using rapid reviews: international survey @JRBtrip @rapidreviews_i @AndrewB77877966 https://t.co/X5lh8rvnBA
How much uncertainty are decisionmakers willing to accept when using rapid reviews? New publication from our team https://t.co/FsLx0YeuPe
Thought of you @JoG13 https://t.co/BBMOmanR15
RT @TammyJClifford: Trading certainty for speed - how much uncertainty are decisionmakers willing to accept when using rapid reviews? http…
RT @CMHealthLibrary: New study: How much uncertainty is acceptable in exchange for a rapid evidence-synthesis?https://t.co/uIgcaT4COZ #Evid…
RT @CMHealthLibrary: New study: How much uncertainty is acceptable in exchange for a rapid evidence-synthesis?https://t.co/uIgcaT4COZ #Evid…
New study: How much uncertainty is acceptable in exchange for a rapid evidence-synthesis?https://t.co/uIgcaT4COZ #Evidencebased #MedLibs
RT @TammyJClifford: Trading certainty for speed - how much uncertainty are decisionmakers willing to accept when using rapid reviews? http…
RT @TammyJClifford: Trading certainty for speed - how much uncertainty are decisionmakers willing to accept when using rapid reviews? http…
Making decisions fast comes with uncertainty. https://t.co/4Kye9jHKoN #bmcmedresmethodol
decisionmakers are willing to accept some tradeoff in #validity 4 a #rapidreview. Yet they expect the validity be close #systematicreviews. https://t.co/jYCSogkYn2
RT @TammyJClifford: Trading certainty for speed - how much uncertainty are decisionmakers willing to accept when using rapid reviews? http…
RT @TammyJClifford: Trading certainty for speed - how much uncertainty are decisionmakers willing to accept when using rapid reviews? http…
So, decision-makers willing to make some validity tradeoffs for speed...but rapid reviews should be just as good as SRs... #unicornreview https://t.co/cwMpjhnKi4
RT @TammyJClifford: Trading certainty for speed - how much uncertainty are decisionmakers willing to accept when using rapid reviews? http…
RT @TammyJClifford: Trading certainty for speed - how much uncertainty are decisionmakers willing to accept when using rapid reviews? http…
RT @TammyJClifford: Trading certainty for speed - how much uncertainty are decisionmakers willing to accept when using rapid reviews? http…
Trading certainty for speed - how much uncertainty are decisionmakers willing to accept when using rapid reviews? https://t.co/wbu3ZI1td8
RT @BarneyUoB: A 'rapid review' of evidence is not a 'systematic review'. It's quicker (cheaper) But is it always enough? @unibirm_MDS @PIC…
how much uncertainty are decision-makers and guideline developers willing to accept when using rapid reviews? https://t.co/5Sx9ikIflW
RT @BioMedCentral: How much uncertainty are decisionmakers and guideline developers willing to accept when using rapid reviews? https://t.…
RT @BarneyUoB: A 'rapid review' of evidence is not a 'systematic review'. It's quicker (cheaper) But is it always enough? @unibirm_MDS @PIC…
Time to event? Decision makers trade rigour (#SystematicReviews) for speed (#RapidReviews) yet want validity in both https://t.co/Cn3i6dICI6
A 'rapid review' of evidence is not a 'systematic review'. It's quicker (cheaper) But is it always enough? @unibirm_MDS @PICJournalWatch https://t.co/KRgxPyOlii
RT @robinvernooij: Guideline developers are willing to accept little trade-off in validity for a rapid synthesis. @MedicalEvidence https://…
Trading certainty for speed - how much uncertainty are decisionmakers and guideline developer... https://t.co/bBl9W28s4N #bmcmedresmethodol
RT @BioMedCentral: How much uncertainty are decisionmakers and guideline developers willing to accept when using rapid reviews? https://t.…
How much uncertainty are decisionmakers and guideline developers willing to accept when using rapid reviews? https://t.co/QVI1iKAgxV https://t.co/M35GqRzd47
RT @robinvernooij: Guideline developers are willing to accept little trade-off in validity for a rapid synthesis. @MedicalEvidence https://…
Guideline developers are willing to accept little trade-off in validity for a rapid synthesis. @MedicalEvidence https://t.co/Lau1ugVsUZ