The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Too many crying babies: a systematic review of pain management practices during immunizations on YouTube
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pediatrics, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2431-14-134 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Denise Harrison, Margaret Sampson, Jessica Reszel, Koowsar Abdulla, Nick Barrowman, Jordi Cumber, Ann Fuller, Claudia Li, Stuart Nicholls, Catherine M Pound |
| Abstract |
Early childhood immunizations, although vital for preventative health, are painful and too often lead to fear of needles. Effective pain management strategies during infant immunizations include breastfeeding, sweet solutions, and upright front-to-front holding. However, it is unknown how often these strategies are used in clinical practice. We aimed to review the content of YouTube videos showing infants being immunized to ascertain parents' and health care professionals' use of pain management strategies, as well as to assess infants' pain and distress. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 47% |
| Scientists | 6 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 178 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 11% |
| Researcher | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 36 | 20% |
| Unknown | 59 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 8% |
| Engineering | 8 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Unknown | 67 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,316,577
of 26,367,306 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#131
of 3,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,222
of 241,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#4
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,367,306 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,598 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.