↓ Skip to main content

Adjusting for measurement error in baseline prognostic biomarkers included in a time-to-event analysis: a joint modelling approach

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Adjusting for measurement error in baseline prognostic biomarkers included in a time-to-event analysis: a joint modelling approach
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-13-146
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael J Crowther, Paul C Lambert, Keith R Abrams

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 3%
Vietnam 1 3%
Unknown 38 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 43%
Unspecified 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 8 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 43%
Unspecified 11 28%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 8%
Mathematics 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 4 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,109,844
of 13,555,083 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#702
of 1,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,716
of 270,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,555,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them