| Title |
Steps toward improving diet and exercise for cancer survivors (STRIDE): a quasi-randomised controlled trial protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2407-14-428 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lauren J Frensham, Dorota M Zarnowiecki, Gaynor Parfitt, Rebecca M Stanley, James Dollman |
| Abstract |
Cancer survivorship rates have increased in developed countries largely due to population ageing and improvements in cancer care. Survivorship is a neglected phase of cancer treatment and is often associated with adverse physical and psychological effects. There is a need for broadly accessible, non-pharmacological measures that may prolong disease-free survival, reduce or alleviate co-morbidities and enhance quality of life. The aim of the Steps TowaRd Improving Diet and Exercise (STRIDE) study is to evaluate the effectiveness of an online-delivered physical activity intervention for increasing walking in cancer survivors living in metropolitan and rural areas of South Australia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 181 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 12% |
| Researcher | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 36 | 20% |
| Unknown | 47 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 14% |
| Psychology | 23 | 13% |
| Sports and Recreations | 10 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 17% |
| Unknown | 52 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2015.
All research outputs
#15,301,754
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#4,106
of 8,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,524
of 228,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#66
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,276 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.