RT @Protohedgehog: "60.8% of researchers do not self-archive their work even when it is free and in keeping with journal policy." This is i…
RT @Protohedgehog: "60.8% of researchers do not self-archive their work even when it is free and in keeping with journal policy." This is i…
RT @paleorxiv: "It is logical and cost-efficient for institutions and researchers to promote OA by self-archiving publications of restricte…
RT @paleorxiv: "It is logical and cost-efficient for institutions and researchers to promote OA by self-archiving publications of restricte…
@CDWren @colinpurrington @unpaywall Unpaywall only works if researchers actually use the self-archiving opportunities available to them! Comments here: https://t.co/RQXFpjvg6v Depressing research on this here: https://t.co/UA49RVpvhN :)
RT @Protohedgehog: "60.8% of researchers do not self-archive their work even when it is free and in keeping with journal policy." This is i…
"It is logical and cost-efficient for institutions and researchers to promote OA by self-archiving publications of restricted access, as it not only allows research to be cited by a broader audience, it also augments citation rates." https://t.co/vwAvUS8Xj
"60.8% of researchers do not self-archive their work even when it is free and in keeping with journal policy." This is in global health research. Don't be one of the 60.8%, be better. https://t.co/UA49RVpvhN
RT @Protohedgehog: @DanielPaulOD Context: In medical health research, 60.8% of researchers could self archive for free, no risk, but don’t.…
RT @Protohedgehog: @DanielPaulOD Context: In medical health research, 60.8% of researchers could self archive for free, no risk, but don’t.…
RT @Protohedgehog: @DanielPaulOD Context: In medical health research, 60.8% of researchers could self archive for free, no risk, but don’t.…
RT @Protohedgehog: @DanielPaulOD Context: In medical health research, 60.8% of researchers could self archive for free, no risk, but don’t.…
RT @Protohedgehog: @DanielPaulOD Context: In medical health research, 60.8% of researchers could self archive for free, no risk, but don’t.…
@DanielPaulOD Context: In medical health research, 60.8% of researchers could self archive for free, no risk, but don’t. Why? https://t.co/UA49RVpvhN
RT @ValeryRidde: @adannadchukwuma @H_S_Global @ird_fr see the original article https://t.co/ZnOiqWducE
@adannadchukwuma @H_S_Global @ird_fr see the original article https://t.co/ZnOiqWducE
RT @TheResearchLoop: "limiting public access can negatively impact implementation & outcomes of health policy & reduce public understanding…
RT @OABrunel: 60.8% of papers that could have been self-archived were not Key finding from https://t.co/ez9Vrtx6xU
RT @Protohedgehog: Yay for Open Peer Review at @BioMedCentral! You can read my latest report on OA and health research https://t.co/xhaVW4z…
Yay for Open Peer Review at @BioMedCentral! You can read my latest report on OA and health research https://t.co/xhaVW4zPoK #OSFair2017
RT @Protohedgehog: That statistic from this paper: https://t.co/UA49RVpvhN (which I peer reviewed!) #osfair2017 https://t.co/DIb7SB8881
RT @Protohedgehog: That statistic from this paper: https://t.co/UA49RVpvhN (which I peer reviewed!) #osfair2017 https://t.co/DIb7SB8881
RT @Protohedgehog: That statistic from this paper: https://t.co/UA49RVpvhN (which I peer reviewed!) #osfair2017 https://t.co/DIb7SB8881
RT @Protohedgehog: That statistic from this paper: https://t.co/UA49RVpvhN (which I peer reviewed!) #osfair2017 https://t.co/DIb7SB8881
That statistic from this paper: https://t.co/UA49RVpvhN (which I peer reviewed!) #osfair2017 https://t.co/DIb7SB8881
RT @OABrunel: 60.8% of papers that could have been self-archived were not Key finding from https://t.co/ez9Vrtx6xU
RT @OABrunel: 60.8% of papers that could have been self-archived were not Key finding from https://t.co/ez9Vrtx6xU
RT @OABrunel: 60.8% of papers that could have been self-archived were not Key finding from https://t.co/ez9Vrtx6xU
60.8% of papers that could have been self-archived were not Key finding from https://t.co/ez9Vrtx6xU
Fascinating article on Global health research and open access publishing practices. https://t.co/ez9Vrtx6xU
RT @careif: Knowledge sharing in global health research – the impact, uptake and cost of open access to scholarly literature https://t.co/z…
RT @TheResearchLoop: "limiting public access can negatively impact implementation & outcomes of health policy & reduce public understanding…
RT @TheResearchLoop: "limiting public access can negatively impact implementation & outcomes of health policy & reduce public understanding…
RT @TheResearchLoop: "limiting public access can negatively impact implementation & outcomes of health policy & reduce public understanding…
"limiting public access can negatively impact implementation & outcomes of health policy & reduce public understanding of health issues." https://t.co/CY27z5YgXa
RT @_Elise_smith: Finally published! https://t.co/t4CpmcL5db
RT @_Elise_smith: Finally published! https://t.co/t4CpmcL5db
Limiting the accessibility of knowledge may reduce information propagation / Ebola was known in 1982 but the paper was not open access https://t.co/mrbq2eL08D
RT @hildabast: The urgency & imperative of #Openaccess: important, thorough look at global health research👍 @_Elise_smith @lariviev https:/…
RT @hildabast: The urgency & imperative of #Openaccess: important, thorough look at global health research👍 @_Elise_smith @lariviev https:/…
The urgency & imperative of #Openaccess: important, thorough look at global health research👍 @_Elise_smith @lariviev https://t.co/gOcUlV6ku1 https://t.co/riyI3TQ1rw
RT @ValeryRidde: by @_Elise_smith = 61% of researchers do not self-archive their work even when it is free & accepted by journal https://t…
RT @_Elise_smith: Finally published! https://t.co/t4CpmcL5db
RT @_Elise_smith: Finally published! https://t.co/t4CpmcL5db
RT @_Elise_smith: Finally published! https://t.co/t4CpmcL5db
Knowledge sharing in global health research – the impact, uptake and cost of open access to scholarly literature https://t.co/59raIpZEdn
RT @_Elise_smith: Finally published! https://t.co/t4CpmcL5db
RT @_Elise_smith: Finally published! https://t.co/t4CpmcL5db
RT @ValeryRidde: by @_Elise_smith = 61% of researchers do not self-archive their work even when it is free & accepted by journal https://t…
RT @ValeryRidde: by @_Elise_smith = 61% of researchers do not self-archive their work even when it is free & accepted by journal https://t…
RT @_Elise_smith: Finally published! https://t.co/t4CpmcL5db
RT @_Elise_smith: Finally published! https://t.co/t4CpmcL5db
RT @McDawg: "limiting public access can negatively impact implementation and outcomes of health policy and reduce public understanding of h…
RT @_Elise_smith: Finally published! https://t.co/t4CpmcL5db
"limiting public access can negatively impact implementation and outcomes of health policy and reduce public understanding of health issues" https://t.co/eL2rgtYbur
RT @_Elise_smith: Finally published! https://t.co/t4CpmcL5db
RT @CharlesMarsan: Drôlement, même s'ils ont le droit d'archiver les articles qu'ils publient, plus de 60% des chercheurs ne le font pas. @…
Drôlement, même s'ils ont le droit d'archiver les articles qu'ils publient, plus de 60% des chercheurs ne le font pas. @_Elise_smith https://t.co/iZSPSvwAIl
RT @GlobalPHObserv: Knowledge sharing in #globalhealth research – impact, uptake and cost of open access to scholarly literature https://…
Knowledge sharing in #globalhealth research – impact, uptake and cost of open access to scholarly literature https://t.co/FGgi4dvdFI
RT @_Elise_smith: Finally published! https://t.co/t4CpmcL5db
RT @_Elise_smith: Finally published! https://t.co/t4CpmcL5db
Knowledge sharing in global health research – the impact, uptake and cost of open access to scholarly literature https://t.co/z0iQJkMvuz #
RT @ValeryRidde: by @_Elise_smith = 61% of researchers do not self-archive their work even when it is free & accepted by journal https://t…
Finally published! https://t.co/t4CpmcL5db
RT @micm80: Why knowledge sharing of global health research matters. https://t.co/rid7F8op1Y
RT @equitylist: Knowledge sharing in #globalhealth research – impact, uptake and cost of open access to scholarly literature https://t.co…
RT @equitylist: Knowledge sharing in #globalhealth research – impact, uptake and cost of open access to scholarly literature https://t.co…
Knowledge sharing in global #health #research – the impact, uptake and cost of open access to scholarly literature https://t.co/P6xHSQJaHw
RT @RickyPo: Knowledge sharing in global health research – the impact, uptake and cost of open access to scholarly literature https://t.co/…
Interesting article on inequalities in access to global health research - still a lot more to on #oa, APCs, access https://t.co/pipZUt8uYu
RT @RickyPo: Knowledge sharing in global health research – the impact, uptake and cost of open access to scholarly literature https://t.co/…
Knowledge sharing in global health research – the impact, uptake and cost of open access to scholarly literature https://t.co/3P4Eg3qGxF
https://t.co/e2qjAdI1fs #shareknowledge #leanandapply BHA Solutions - بی ایچ اے سلوشنز
RT @ValeryRidde: by @_Elise_smith = 61% of researchers do not self-archive their work even when it is free & accepted by journal https://t…
RT @ValeryRidde: by @_Elise_smith = 61% of researchers do not self-archive their work even when it is free & accepted by journal https://t…
RT @ValeryRidde: by @_Elise_smith = 61% of researchers do not self-archive their work even when it is free & accepted by journal https://t…
RT @ValeryRidde: by @_Elise_smith = 61% of researchers do not self-archive their work even when it is free & accepted by journal https://t…
RT @equitylist: Knowledge sharing in #globalhealth research – impact, uptake and cost of open access to scholarly literature https://t.co…
Knowledge sharing in global health research – the impact, uptake and cost of open access to scholarly literature https://t.co/NLGeCdPGM8
RT @Protohedgehog: Knowledge sharing in global health research – the impact, uptake and cost of open access to scholarly literature https:/…
Was honoured to peer review this great study (report public soon)! Should be of interest to #openaccess and health folks (@petergrabitz) https://t.co/WuZFQgUgrf
Knowledge sharing in global health research – the impact, uptake and cost of open access to scholarly literature https://t.co/UA49RVpvhN
@BioMedCentral Hi! My peer review report is not the correct file here https://t.co/xhaVW4zPoK - Missing like the whole report!
RT @ValeryRidde: by @_Elise_smith = 61% of researchers do not self-archive their work even when it is free & accepted by journal https://t…
RT @equitylist: Knowledge sharing in #globalhealth research – impact, uptake and cost of open access to scholarly literature https://t.co…
RT @equitylist: Knowledge sharing in #globalhealth research – impact, uptake and cost of open access to scholarly literature https://t.co…
by @_Elise_smith = 61% of researchers do not self-archive their work even when it is free & accepted by journal https://t.co/ZnOiqWducE
RT @equitylist: Knowledge sharing in #globalhealth research – impact, uptake and cost of open access to scholarly literature https://t.co…
Knowledge sharing in #globalhealth research – impact, uptake and cost of open access to scholarly literature https://t.co/wqwHZH1r1M
Knowledge sharing in global health research – the impact, uptake & cost of #openaccess to scholarly literature https://t.co/tPTSXZpvup
RT @LizHoffmanbmc: Knowledge sharing in global health research – the impact, uptake and cost of open access to scholarly literature https:/…
Knowledge sharing in global health research – the impact, uptake and cost… https://t.co/tzB5zs84lM #HealthResPolSys
Knowledge sharing in global health research – the impact, uptake and cost of open access to scholarly literature https://t.co/14FCY3taqy https://t.co/sm2dYCTmdg