"The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists” http://t.co/PzPvuTnELe Oh no I should get off Twitter!
Had enough of #impactfactors already? Here's a Kardashian Index from @neilhall_uk. Comment article in @GenomeBiology http://t.co/wCAT6ildzf
The Kardashian index - the true measure of a scientist's worth. Forget this Impact factor malarkey! http://t.co/ocWiMMzT8I What's yours??
The Kardashian index: citations vs twitter followers for scientists" http://t.co/ydBW80SmMF HT @NAChristakis http://t.co/WlowDW4mQ2
Oh dear my K-index is 14! MT @shanemcanning: why not check your K-index, inspired by @KimKardashian? http://t.co/iJAyfehN0W #impactfactor
HAHA! "The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientist" http://t.co/rvdtnzv8je #socialmedia #phdchat
This is a very funny piece relevant for medical/scientific tweeters: the Kardashian index http://t.co/zSBQB9VP5k via @cshperspectives
@BioMedCentral:Social media vs. scientific reliability. @neilhall_uk brings you the inspired #KardashianIndex: https://t.co/GirR6cwJEj
Social media vs. scientific reliability. @neilhall_uk brings you the inspired Kardashian Index: https://t.co/Xb1FeODmqR (via @GenomeBiology)
本気か?RT @BioMedCentral Social media vs. scientific reliability @neilhall_uk brings you the inspired Kardashian Index: https://t.co/YTttNaZSNi
The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists (roughly: followers/citations) http://t.co/0k4SMEM3mV
The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists http://t.co/iNQa7t8SZr #genomebiology
The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists (roughly: followers/citations) http://t.co/0k4SMEM3mV
With all this discussion of #impactfactor why not check your K-index, as inspired by @KimKardashian? http://t.co/2OQ6pmB9va
Social media vs. scientific reliability. @neilhall_uk brings you the inspired Kardashian Index: https://t.co/Xb1FeODmqR (via @GenomeBiology)
The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists (roughly: followers/citations) http://t.co/0k4SMEM3mV
My ‘Kardashian Index’ is 2.85. I'm not a Kardashian! http://t.co/lWoLc4n4lL cc/ @neilhall_uk (and thanks to @WyoWeeds for his R function!)
With all this discussion of #impactfactor why not check your K-index, as inspired by @KimKardashian? http://t.co/2OQ6pmB9va
With all this discussion of #impactfactor why not check your K-index, as inspired by @KimKardashian? http://t.co/2OQ6pmB9va
With all this discussion of #impactfactor why not check your K-index, as inspired by @KimKardashian? http://t.co/2OQ6pmB9va
This is a very funny piece relevant for medical/scientific tweeters: the Kardashian index http://t.co/zSBQB9VP5k via @cshperspectives
This is a very funny piece relevant for medical/scientific tweeters: the Kardashian index http://t.co/zSBQB9VP5k via @cshperspectives
Neil Halls tongue in cheek paper on The Kardashian index is worth a read and is a must tweet http://t.co/JBPEatNz5d
Really fun read by @neilhall_uk about 'Kardashian index' in science http://t.co/f4YJxuh5K2 - # of citations vs twitter followers
Ironic that I'm tweeting about this: The Kardashian Index http://t.co/1egvMIST7a
The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists http://t.co/FGOjcl1AE0
The K-index, only slightly less inane than the JIF, H-index, etc http://t.co/vzXc9pGemn
.@neilhall_uk's comment on Kardashian index now free on GB website: http://t.co/BaJ28KdNf4
The "Kardashian Index" is based on the direct comparison of numbers of citations and Twitter followers. http://t.co/CkC7rD1nr6
The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists http://t.co/FGOjcl1AE0
The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists http://t.co/GnOyzbQcBI
The K-index, only slightly less inane than the JIF, H-index, etc http://t.co/vzXc9pGemn
As #JournalCitationReports are due today very appropriately @neilhall_uk writes about scientific Kardashian index http://t.co/I16HNSmSVT 1/2
The K-index, only slightly less inane than the JIF, H-index, etc http://t.co/vzXc9pGemn
The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists http://t.co/k4d28O2QwF #genomebiology via @neilhall_uk
.@neilhall_uk's comment on Kardashian index now free on GB website: http://t.co/BaJ28KdNf4
My Kardashian index (http://t.co/8feeq5EeHG) is only 0.16. Does this mean that I should publish less or tweet more? #meaningoflife
V. unusual Genome Biology paper: "The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists" http://t.co/eDtFyM5JkZ
The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists http://t.co/y3wAfcDbWP #genomebiology
As #JournalCitationReports are due today very appropriately @neilhall_uk writes about scientific Kardashian index http://t.co/I16HNSmSVT 1/2
Funny and interesting piece by @neilhall_uk: "The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile..." http://t.co/ewQPEs8U2b
Hilarious: Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists @neilhall_uk @GenomeBiology http://t.co/Lk8IGbMsFT
The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists http://t.co/k4d28O2QwF #genomebiology via @neilhall_uk
@puntofisso you may find this interesting http://t.co/vhWWeyQVrf
As #JournalCitationReports are due today very appropriately @neilhall_uk writes about scientific Kardashian index http://t.co/I16HNSmSVT 1/2
Tweeting this might improve my K-index? http://t.co/k1wYw1Dv7q
Really fun read by @neilhall_uk about 'Kardashian index' in science http://t.co/f4YJxuh5K2 - # of citations vs twitter followers
The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists http://t.co/NHUSxn6qsv #genomebiology
The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists http://t.co/ObfmrqTrGl
We #scientists love our metrics. Enter the #Kardashian index! Perhaps this tweet will improve mine . . .http://t.co/ovFdCBXtUZ
maybe I get some more followers (~1500) and move up to Kardashians level after this tweet. The Kardashian index http://t.co/ekqIMhfbva
The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists - http://t.co/RN2cwJouB5
The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists http://t.co/NHUSxn6qsv #genomebiology
my K-index is 0.0413, fwiw http://t.co/TUEAZCv744.
GenomeBiology: The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists: In the era o... http://t.co/AxSnNSodfo
Hilarious: Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists @neilhall_uk @GenomeBiology http://t.co/Lk8IGbMsFT
Hilarious: Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists @neilhall_uk @GenomeBiology http://t.co/Lk8IGbMsFT
What is your #Kardashian index? Mine is 0.5. http://t.co/acFAOTqnOM by @neilhall_uk #science #socialmedia #k_index http://t.co/HobDgZ1QhB
This is a very funny piece relevant for medical/scientific tweeters: the Kardashian index http://t.co/zSBQB9VP5k via @cshperspectives
I like the Wiki citation. #Kardashian #realscience http://t.co/KPefFRzGuK #genomebiology @neilhall_uk
Here's what I took from that paper @TheAtavism, "According to this equation, this is my index of sour grapeness" http://t.co/yREyd33IQi
Top @RNomics #tweeted story: The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant soci… http://t.co/MPYfO1N2Lu, see more http://t.co/xyDEiJTuB7
Evidently I have ~10x more followers than my scientific worth entitles me to http://t.co/FU82VPGz4d guess you know what to do...
Really fun read by @neilhall_uk about 'Kardashian index' in science http://t.co/f4YJxuh5K2 - # of citations vs twitter followers
The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists http://t.co/0DrTlIiHMS #genomebiology
My Kardashian index is is ~5. Does that mean I get to marry the quiet, normal version of Kim?! http://t.co/zFzBP8g2jA
RT @joe_pickrell: My "Kardashian index" (http://t.co/ZtcVWToK8d) is well over 5. Conclusion: the metric is horribly flawed :) @neilhall_uk
As #JournalCitationReports are due today very appropriately @neilhall_uk writes about scientific Kardashian index http://t.co/I16HNSmSVT 1/2
Double-checking it's not April Fools' Day... the Kardashian index by @neilhall_uk in @GenomeBiology. Quite astute! http://t.co/tHwmPbvC1k
My Kardashian index is 0.42. Fun paper: http://t.co/gSEA8OuEfz . I need to get more twitter followers
The Kardashian index: A measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists http://t.co/On7W15Qupt
My Kardashian index is 0.42. I should have more twitter followers based on my publications. Fun paper: http://t.co/gSEA8OuEfz
RT @joe_pickrell: My "Kardashian index" (http://t.co/ZtcVWToK8d) is well over 5. Conclusion: the metric is horribly flawed :) @neilhall_uk
Hilarious: Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists @neilhall_uk @GenomeBiology http://t.co/Lk8IGbMsFT
Mine: 0.8! Safely a non-K. Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists @neilhall_uk http://t.co/qgjrVzW4iv
Delightful nuggets from study: "Please don’t take this as representative of my normal research rigor." @neilhall_uk http://t.co/UTVI8kgjv2
My kardashian index is 0.3 - I'm undervalued, but the alternative is worse. A bit of fun in Genome Biology today: http://t.co/UTVI8kgjv2
Hilarious: Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists @neilhall_uk @GenomeBiology http://t.co/Lk8IGbMsFT
My K-index is 1.5, well below the Kardashian zone http://t.co/VJtfw6uA1y
The Kardashian index, a scientists publication record vs. number of twitter followers - contender of an Ignobel? http://t.co/ySSMFRSl6h
Hilarious: Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists @neilhall_uk @GenomeBiology http://t.co/Lk8IGbMsFT
"Having an opinion on something does not make one an expert." http://t.co/JTgMSBkkry
@neilhall_uk's K-index - brilliant! :) http://t.co/RC2FcS0nPr
What a fun read! "@GenomeBiology: @neilhall_uk writes about scientific Kardashian index http://t.co/ZwJPv8R9O6 1/2"
please read this: the Kradashian index for scientists MT @BioDataGanache @GenomeBiology: @neilhall_uk http://t.co/RfM6KpC4lu
Hilarious: Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists @neilhall_uk @GenomeBiology http://t.co/Lk8IGbMsFT
Really fun read by @neilhall_uk about 'Kardashian index' in science http://t.co/f4YJxuh5K2 - # of citations vs twitter followers
Interesting article by @neilhall_uk in #genomebiology about the #Kardashian index for scientists http://t.co/k8ym07vqU9
My K-index is about 0.6, not bad balance rly RT @GenomeBiology: @neilhall_uk writes abt scientific Kardashian index http://t.co/GFWQ3CcnUF
Interesting article by @neilhall_uk in #genomebiology about the #Kardashian index for scientists http://t.co/k8ym07vqU9
My K-index is about 0.6, not bad balance rly RT @GenomeBiology: @neilhall_uk writes abt scientific Kardashian index http://t.co/GFWQ3CcnUF
As #JournalCitationReports are due today very appropriately @neilhall_uk writes about scientific Kardashian index http://t.co/I16HNSmSVT 1/2
Really fun read by @neilhall_uk about 'Kardashian index' in science http://t.co/f4YJxuh5K2 - # of citations vs twitter followers
Hah! K-index? http://t.co/Ew355nqZqU
The Kardashian index: A measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists http://t.co/On7W15Qupt
Hilarious: Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists @neilhall_uk @GenomeBiology http://t.co/Lk8IGbMsFT
"Having an opinion on something does not make one an expert." http://t.co/JTgMSBkkry
As #JournalCitationReports are due today very appropriately @neilhall_uk writes about scientific Kardashian index http://t.co/I16HNSmSVT 1/2
My "Kardashian index" (http://t.co/3WYTWn4van) is well over 5. Conclusion: the metric is horribly flawed :) @neilhall_uk
The Kardashian Index: discrepancy between a scientist’s social media profile vs publication record http://t.co/GiNE6ySm5B