↓ Skip to main content

Communicating the promise, risks, and ethics of large-scale, open space microbiome and metagenome research

Overview of attention for article published in Microbiome, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
46 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
Title
Communicating the promise, risks, and ethics of large-scale, open space microbiome and metagenome research
Published in
Microbiome, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40168-017-0349-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daria Shamarina, Iana Stoyantcheva, Christopher E. Mason, Kyle Bibby, Eran Elhaik

Abstract

The public commonly associates microorganisms with pathogens. This suspicion of microorganisms is understandable, as historically microorganisms have killed more humans than any other agent while remaining largely unknown until the late seventeenth century with the works of van Leeuwenhoek and Kircher. Despite our improved understanding regarding microorganisms, the general public are apt to think of diseases rather than of the majority of harmless or beneficial species that inhabit our bodies and the built and natural environment. As long as microbiome research was confined to labs, the public's exposure to microbiology was limited. The recent launch of global microbiome surveys, such as the Earth Microbiome Project and MetaSUB (Metagenomics and Metadesign of Subways and Urban Biomes) project, has raised ethical, financial, feasibility, and sustainability concerns as to the public's level of understanding and potential reaction to the findings, which, done improperly, risk negative implications for ongoing and future investigations, but done correctly, can facilitate a new vision of "smart cities." To facilitate improved future research, we describe here the major concerns that our discussions with ethics committees, community leaders, and government officials have raised, and we expound on how to address them. We further discuss ethical considerations of microbiome surveys and provide practical recommendations for public engagement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 117 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 14%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 8%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 28 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 13%
Environmental Science 8 7%
Engineering 5 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Other 27 23%
Unknown 31 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,119,467
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#331
of 1,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,744
of 332,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#12
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,792 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.