↓ Skip to main content

What could infant and young child nutrition learn from sweatshops?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
What could infant and young child nutrition learn from sweatshops?
Published in
BMC Public Health, May 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-276
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter A Singer, Sean Ansett, Isabella Sagoe-Moses

Abstract

Adequate infant and young child nutrition demands high rates of breastfeeding and good access to nutrient rich complementary foods, requiring public sector action to promote breastfeeding and home based complementary feeding, and private sector action to refrain from undermining breastfeeding and to provide affordable, nutrient rich complementary foods. Unfortunately, due to a lack of trust, the public and private sectors, from both the North and the South, do not work well together in achieving optimal infant and young child nutrition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Mali 1 1%
Taiwan 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 66 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 20%
Student > Master 14 20%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 16 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 20%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Philosophy 2 3%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 17 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2013.
All research outputs
#2,879,924
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,319
of 14,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,849
of 110,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#35
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.