Title |
Beneficial effects of treatment with sensory isolation in flotation-tank as a preventive health-care intervention – a randomized controlled pilot trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6882-14-417 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anette Kjellgren, Jessica Westman |
Abstract |
Sensory isolation in a flotation tank is a method known for inducing deep relaxation and subsequent positive health effects for patients suffering from e.g. stress or muscle tensions pains. Very few studies have investigated this method as a preventive health-care intervention. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects in healthy participants after receiving a series of flotation tank treatment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 27 | 41% |
United Kingdom | 6 | 9% |
Canada | 4 | 6% |
Sweden | 2 | 3% |
Kyrgyzstan | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 2% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 23 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 58 | 88% |
Scientists | 5 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 206 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 38 | 18% |
Student > Master | 34 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 13% |
Researcher | 20 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 9% |
Other | 32 | 15% |
Unknown | 39 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 60 | 29% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 8% |
Neuroscience | 9 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
Other | 41 | 20% |
Unknown | 45 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 813. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2024.
All research outputs
#23,556
of 25,856,138 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#3
of 3,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133
of 274,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,138 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.