@giustini @FrontiersIn Interesting! I also wonder if these have characteristic differences or are overall similar to previous PROSPERO registrations. 2 past papers characterizing PROSPERO registered protocols (I'm sure there are more): https://t.co/8ux8Nmr
PROSPERO has been part of a solution to improve transparency in research. However, PROSPERO now receives thousands of registrations per year (11,000 in 2017 https://t.co/cMxNWZ8C48) and has been taking 5+ months to put up a registered protocol on their web
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting https://t.co/UGNG4uL5LQ #UMTHLSysRev
RT @erbradfield: Great to be one of the 30,000+ #systematicreview #phdlife #participatoryarts #olderpeople #prospero #mixedmethods #qualita…
Great to be one of the 30,000+ #systematicreview #phdlife #participatoryarts #olderpeople #prospero #mixedmethods #qualitative #quantitative #evidence #synthesis https://t.co/xfp4MT2raV
Interesting to see no of SRs in production but where does our evidence go? Perhaps we need an implementation registry? Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting https://t.co/4z4jMrClLn #sysrevsj
RT @mjpages: Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO has skyrocketed, with 30,000 now underway https://t.co/dtLKyphhRR New paper wit…
In 6 years, nearly 30,000 #SystematicReview protocols were registered on @crd_york’s #PROSPERO. Learn more in this new #SystematicReviewsJournal article: https://t.co/EPTeHA32Sy
RT @saldanha_ian: Uggh... Systematic reviewers continue to be poor at pre-specifying #outcomes! Almost 30% specified ONLY the domain. That'…
RT @saldanha_ian: Uggh... Systematic reviewers continue to be poor at pre-specifying #outcomes! Almost 30% specified ONLY the domain. That'…
RT @hildabast: PROSPERO getting substantial: over 11,000 systematic review protocols registered in 2017, up from 8K the year before & 6K th…
RT @hildabast: PROSPERO getting substantial: over 11,000 systematic review protocols registered in 2017, up from 8K the year before & 6K th…
RT @saldanha_ian: Uggh... Systematic reviewers continue to be poor at pre-specifying #outcomes! Almost 30% specified ONLY the domain. That'…
RT @BMJRtoP: Planning a systematic review? Want the world to know? Register it at #PROSPERO @crd_york https://t.co/0LWfAn7ont You’ll be in…
RT @mjpages: Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO has skyrocketed, with 30,000 now underway https://t.co/dtLKyphhRR New paper wit…
RT @mjpages: Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO has skyrocketed, with 30,000 now underway https://t.co/dtLKyphhRR New paper wit…
RT @MedicalEvidence: Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO increased rapidly between 2011 & 2017, which benefits users of health e…
RT @saldanha_ian: Uggh... Systematic reviewers continue to be poor at pre-specifying #outcomes! Almost 30% specified ONLY the domain. That'…
RT @saldanha_ian: Uggh... Systematic reviewers continue to be poor at pre-specifying #outcomes! Almost 30% specified ONLY the domain. That'…
RT @mjpages: Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO has skyrocketed, with 30,000 now underway https://t.co/dtLKyphhRR New paper wit…
RT @mjpages: Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO has skyrocketed, with 30,000 now underway https://t.co/dtLKyphhRR New paper wit…
RT @mjpages: Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO has skyrocketed, with 30,000 now underway https://t.co/dtLKyphhRR New paper wit…
RT @mjpages: Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO has skyrocketed, with 30,000 now underway https://t.co/dtLKyphhRR New paper wit…
RT @mjpages: Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO has skyrocketed, with 30,000 now underway https://t.co/dtLKyphhRR New paper wit…
RT @MedicalEvidence: Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO increased rapidly between 2011 & 2017, which benefits users of health e…
RT @MedicalEvidence: Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO increased rapidly between 2011 & 2017, which benefits users of health e…
RT @MedicalEvidence: Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO increased rapidly between 2011 & 2017, which benefits users of health e…
RT @erbradfield: Glad to have contributed to the rise in #systematicreviews registered @crd_york last year #PROSPERO #phdlife Watch this s…
Glad to have contributed to the rise in #systematicreviews registered @crd_york last year #PROSPERO #phdlife Watch this space for results #arts #ageing https://t.co/KRXXQT39tL
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO increased rapidly between 2011 & 2017, which benefits users of health evidence who want to know about ongoing SRs – read more via #SysRevsJ: https://t.co/YRPUjVAZ1m
RT @mjpages: Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO has skyrocketed, with 30,000 now underway https://t.co/dtLKyphhRR New paper wit…
RT @hildabast: PROSPERO getting substantial: over 11,000 systematic review protocols registered in 2017, up from 8K the year before & 6K th…
RT @mjpages: Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO has skyrocketed, with 30,000 now underway https://t.co/dtLKyphhRR New paper wit…
RT @MedicalEvidence: Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records & counting! New article in #SysRevsJ by @mjpages @Laris…
Good or bad? More quality through registration or the downside of the mass production of redundant, misleading, and conflicted systematic reviews? https://t.co/V6BcsbrCwj
RT @hildabast: PROSPERO getting substantial: over 11,000 systematic review protocols registered in 2017, up from 8K the year before & 6K th…
RT @hildabast: PROSPERO getting substantial: over 11,000 systematic review protocols registered in 2017, up from 8K the year before & 6K th…
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records & counting! New article in #SysRevsJ by @mjpages @LarissaShamseer & Andrea Tricco: https://t.co/YRPUjVAZ1m https://t.co/O7ugfodfOO
Interesting paper showing the number of systematic reviews registered on PROSPERO has increased dramatically over the last couple of years. Agree with conclusions that next step is checking how closely finished systematic reviews match protocols. https://t
RT @saldanha_ian: Uggh... Systematic reviewers continue to be poor at pre-specifying #outcomes! Almost 30% specified ONLY the domain. That'…
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting https://t.co/uJXoRsFrsO #sysrevsj
RT @hildabast: PROSPERO getting substantial: over 11,000 systematic review protocols registered in 2017, up from 8K the year before & 6K th…
RT @hildabast: PROSPERO getting substantial: over 11,000 systematic review protocols registered in 2017, up from 8K the year before & 6K th…
RT @BrightonSx_LKS: Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting https://t.co/xQA91FKHSC #sysrevsj
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting https://t.co/xQA91FKHSC #sysrevsj
RT @saldanha_ian: Uggh... Systematic reviewers continue to be poor at pre-specifying #outcomes! Almost 30% specified ONLY the domain. That'…
PROSPERO by @mjpages & Andrea Tricco notes success & we've now passed 30,000 records https://t.co/Lv3rBsqkja
RT @saldanha_ian: Uggh... Systematic reviewers continue to be poor at pre-specifying #outcomes! Almost 30% specified ONLY the domain. That'…
RT @hildabast: PROSPERO getting substantial: over 11,000 systematic review protocols registered in 2017, up from 8K the year before & 6K th…
RT @mjpages: Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO has skyrocketed, with 30,000 now underway https://t.co/dtLKyphhRR New paper wit…
RT @mjpages: Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO has skyrocketed, with 30,000 now underway https://t.co/dtLKyphhRR New paper wit…
RT @hildabast: PROSPERO getting substantial: over 11,000 systematic review protocols registered in 2017, up from 8K the year before & 6K th…
RT @mjpages: Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO has skyrocketed, with 30,000 now underway https://t.co/dtLKyphhRR New paper wit…
RT @hildabast: PROSPERO getting substantial: over 11,000 systematic review protocols registered in 2017, up from 8K the year before & 6K th…
RT @mjpages: Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO has skyrocketed, with 30,000 now underway https://t.co/dtLKyphhRR New paper wit…
RT @mjpages: Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO has skyrocketed, with 30,000 now underway https://t.co/dtLKyphhRR New paper wit…
RT @mjpages: Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO has skyrocketed, with 30,000 now underway https://t.co/dtLKyphhRR New paper wit…
RT @saldanha_ian: Uggh... Systematic reviewers continue to be poor at pre-specifying #outcomes! Almost 30% specified ONLY the domain. That'…
RT @mjpages: Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO has skyrocketed, with 30,000 now underway https://t.co/dtLKyphhRR New paper wit…
RT @saldanha_ian: Uggh... Systematic reviewers continue to be poor at pre-specifying #outcomes! Almost 30% specified ONLY the domain. That'…
Great that people are registering their reviews - stops repitition misery - not surprised by increase - we are seeing it on the ground! https://t.co/b8qO64V4EX
RT @mjpages: Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO has skyrocketed, with 30,000 now underway https://t.co/dtLKyphhRR New paper wit…
RT @saldanha_ian: Uggh... Systematic reviewers continue to be poor at pre-specifying #outcomes! Almost 30% specified ONLY the domain. That'…
RT @saldanha_ian: Uggh... Systematic reviewers continue to be poor at pre-specifying #outcomes! Almost 30% specified ONLY the domain. That'…
Uggh... Systematic reviewers continue to be poor at pre-specifying #outcomes! Almost 30% specified ONLY the domain. That's like saying "I'll measure quality-of-life". There are a 1000 different ways to measure and analyze it! @mjpages @LarissaShamseer htt
RT @hildabast: PROSPERO getting substantial: over 11,000 systematic review protocols registered in 2017, up from 8K the year before & 6K th…
RT @mjpages: Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO has skyrocketed, with 30,000 now underway https://t.co/dtLKyphhRR New paper wit…
RT @mjpages: Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO has skyrocketed, with 30,000 now underway https://t.co/dtLKyphhRR New paper wit…
RT @hildabast: PROSPERO getting substantial: over 11,000 systematic review protocols registered in 2017, up from 8K the year before & 6K th…
RT @mjpages: Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO has skyrocketed, with 30,000 now underway https://t.co/dtLKyphhRR New paper wit…
RT @mjpages: Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO has skyrocketed, with 30,000 now underway https://t.co/dtLKyphhRR New paper wit…
RT @hildabast: PROSPERO getting substantial: over 11,000 systematic review protocols registered in 2017, up from 8K the year before & 6K th…
RT @hildabast: PROSPERO getting substantial: over 11,000 systematic review protocols registered in 2017, up from 8K the year before & 6K th…
RT @mjpages: Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO has skyrocketed, with 30,000 now underway https://t.co/dtLKyphhRR New paper wit…
RT @mjpages: Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO has skyrocketed, with 30,000 now underway https://t.co/dtLKyphhRR New paper wit…
RT @hildabast: PROSPERO getting substantial: over 11,000 systematic review protocols registered in 2017, up from 8K the year before & 6K th…
RT @hildabast: PROSPERO getting substantial: over 11,000 systematic review protocols registered in 2017, up from 8K the year before & 6K th…
RT @hildabast: PROSPERO getting substantial: over 11,000 systematic review protocols registered in 2017, up from 8K the year before & 6K th…
PROSPERO getting substantial: over 11,000 systematic review protocols registered in 2017, up from 8K the year before & 6K the year before that https://t.co/f6PL4XJvE5 Still a tiny HT @mjpages @LarissaShamseer https://t.co/SFkybZOIJc
RT @mjpages: Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO has skyrocketed, with 30,000 now underway https://t.co/dtLKyphhRR New paper wit…
RT @mjpages: Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO has skyrocketed, with 30,000 now underway https://t.co/dtLKyphhRR New paper wit…