Title |
Identification of biomarkers in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast with microinvasion
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Cancer, October 2008
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2407-8-287 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yasuhiro Okumura, Yutaka Yamamoto, Zhenhuan Zhang, Tatsuya Toyama, Teru Kawasoe, Mutsuko Ibusuki, Yumi Honda, Ken-ichi Iyama, Hiroko Yamashita, Hirotaka Iwase |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
South Africa | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 34 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 23% |
Researcher | 6 | 17% |
Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Other | 6 | 17% |
Unknown | 5 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 31% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 29% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 11% |
Linguistics | 1 | 3% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 5 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2013.
All research outputs
#7,549,344
of 23,031,582 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#2,097
of 8,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,246
of 90,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#7
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,031,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,365 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.