↓ Skip to main content

Genetic modification of Bluetongue virus by uptake of "synthetic" genome segments

Overview of attention for article published in Virology Journal, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Genetic modification of Bluetongue virus by uptake of "synthetic" genome segments
Published in
Virology Journal, October 2010
DOI 10.1186/1743-422x-7-261
Authors

René GP van Gennip, Daniel Veldman, Sandra GP van de Water, Piet A van Rijn

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 8%
Indonesia 1 3%
South Africa 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Argentina 1 3%
Unknown 31 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 24%
Researcher 9 24%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Other 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 16%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 11%
Unspecified 3 8%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 2 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2014.
All research outputs
#2,585,737
of 9,633,164 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#467
of 1,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,028
of 100,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,633,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 57th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,911 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.