| Title |
Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, May 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-4-29 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carl R May, Frances Mair, Tracy Finch, Anne MacFarlane, Christopher Dowrick, Shaun Treweek, Tim Rapley, Luciana Ballini, Bie Nio Ong, Anne Rogers, Elizabeth Murray, Glyn Elwyn, France Légaré, Jane Gunn, Victor M Montori |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 30% |
| Mexico | 2 | 20% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,047 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 1% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Mozambique | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1002 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 202 | 19% |
| Researcher | 172 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 141 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 63 | 6% |
| Other | 53 | 5% |
| Other | 207 | 20% |
| Unknown | 209 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 228 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 155 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 108 | 10% |
| Psychology | 82 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 72 | 7% |
| Other | 152 | 15% |
| Unknown | 250 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,895,207
of 24,630,122 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#609
of 1,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,987
of 101,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,630,122 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,774 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.