Subluxation: dogma or science?

@gran1te_mtn @algxtrading "Vertebral subluxation, but for dogs." Gold, Jerry! https://t.co/m4LeZwO9sc https://t.co/x6spLb4A7Y

@paulcallahan36 https://t.co/UJESB2j83f https://t.co/6jrOifTDNf https://t.co/ZCHlbnNXvM https://t.co/3RKRwMdnLQ

@drknowles https://t.co/epzjGOxbAy

@lisaslk @honest_physio @PBlite29 @johnwread @MatthieuSailly @stevenawoor @GregLehman @MaryOKeeffe007 @davidkpope @DerekGriffin86 @JackAChew @tomgoom This is the problem with using subluxation in an esoteric dogmatic way ... Subluxation: dogma or science?

@carter_AB @DonoYEG So, subluxations are based on science? Pray tell, direct me to the peer reviewed evidence of that. I'll wait. https://t.co/DoDC5tw8hJ

@DrJimSaclamacis @HarvardHealth I can't buy into subluxation (maybe yet). The research is just not out there. There's items of my practice that don't have research behind it yet (body tempering). But subluxation just isn't supported. https://t.co/kd8z43XQ

@SkepticCyclist @DocBastard Subluxation exists as chiro jargon. It exists:https://t.co/QpWZFMhmHO

.@arclight Not really. See ref 11 here https://t.co/9FJLuJ3sr5 #SinghBCA https://t.co/pNPZ0Zd94K

.@skipbidder Given the lack of evidence I’d say so & have said so too http://t.co/zJGNHIUHAf

@LiamSchubel "Subluxations are in and of themselves a detriment to one’s health." Where's the evidence? http://t.co/zJGNHIUHAf

@smperle @RealMattPope @JoBrodie @EdzardErnst @mickvagg @JakeFarrWharton http://t.co/ieINTDcILB 10 years of limbo.. still get x-ray

@smperle @RealMattPope @JoBrodie @EdzardErnst @mickvagg @JakeFarrWharton http://t.co/ieINTDcILB 100 years of wasted dose, paid by punters

@smperle @RealMattPope @JoBrodie @EdzardErnst @mickvagg @JakeFarrWharton Chiros own paper http://t.co/ieINTDcILB sublux "could be bullshit"

@smperle @RealMattPope @JoBrodie @EdzardErnst @mickvagg @JakeFarrWharton http://t.co/ieINTDcILB your paper... you are a fundie

@smperle @RealMattPope @JoBrodie @EdzardErnst @mickvagg @JakeFarrWharton The evidence is.. http://t.co/ieINTDcILB

@smperle @RealMattPope @JoBrodie @EdzardErnst @mickvagg @JakeFarrWharton no sublux.. your paper http://t.co/ieINTDcILB

@smperle @RealMattPope @JoBrodie @EdzardErnst @mickvagg @JakeFarrWharton http://t.co/ieINTDcILB you are fourth author.. no sublux eh?

@ExecCanuck @1azylizzie @zeno001 @EdzardErnst @mcleaver I’ve very clear about this in my published papers e.g., http://t.co/zJGNHIUHAf 2/2

@EvidenceBDave @mcleaver @EdzardErnst @zeno001 but cautious and humble in what we claim” http://t.co/zJGNHIUHAf 9/9

@edzardernst “..Subluxation, a myth deeply ingraind in chiro mind-set http://t.co/WeevtG3pNK” http://t.co/nDvjWikfRU http://t.co/9OUpLF9A1j

@edzardernst “..Subluxation, a myth deeply ingraind in chiro mind-set http://t.co/WeevtG3pNK” http://t.co/nDvjWikfRU http://t.co/9OUpLF9A1j

"Silence is not golden: its consent" Old gem authored by @smperle ,K Charlton et al. Keep up the good work @smperle http://t.co/ckDmobIJCb

Very revealing paper by Chiros, about Chiros - worth reading @EdzardErnst @SLSingh http://t.co/WzbkOdBS4Y

Very revealing paper by Chiros, about Chiros - worth reading @EdzardErnst @SLSingh http://t.co/WzbkOdBS4Y

Very revealing paper by Chiros, about Chiros - worth reading @EdzardErnst @SLSingh http://t.co/WzbkOdBS4Y

Very revealing paper by Chiros, about Chiros - worth reading @EdzardErnst @SLSingh http://t.co/WzbkOdBS4Y

Even more problems with the Chiro Subluxation http://t.co/WzbkOdBS4Y http://t.co/oyZwu4OBJD

Chiro paper sums up The Sublux http://t.co/WzbkOdBS4Y http://t.co/JtmolmHxJl

Some Chiros acknowledge no evidence for The Sublux http://t.co/WzbkOdBS4Y http://t.co/AVi7Xqu1bx

@Blue_Wode http://t.co/Bh13blTX http://t.co/DeIBMpXQ http://t.co/7dibHJXF