Title |
The effect of an external magnetic force on cell adhesion and proliferation of magnetically labeled mesenchymal stem cells
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, February 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/1758-2555-2-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Toshio Nakamae, Nobuo Adachi, Takaaki Kobayashi, Yoshihiko Nagata, Tomoyuki Nakasa, Nobuhiro Tanaka, Mitsuo Ochi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 20 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 24% |
Researcher | 4 | 19% |
Professor | 3 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 2 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 43% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 10% |
Chemistry | 2 | 10% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2014.
All research outputs
#7,563,204
of 23,070,218 outputs
Outputs from BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
#232
of 505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,015
of 168,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,070,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.