↓ Skip to main content

Spatial patterns of natural hazards mortality in the United States

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Health Geographics, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 657)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
5 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
169 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
Spatial patterns of natural hazards mortality in the United States
Published in
International Journal of Health Geographics, December 2008
DOI 10.1186/1476-072x-7-64
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin A Borden, Susan L Cutter

Abstract

Studies on natural hazard mortality are most often hazard-specific (e.g. floods, earthquakes, heat), event specific (e.g. Hurricane Katrina), or lack adequate temporal or geographic coverage. This makes it difficult to assess mortality from natural hazards in any systematic way. This paper examines the spatial patterns of natural hazard mortality at the county-level for the U.S. from 1970-2004 using a combination of geographical and epidemiological methods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
Germany 1 <1%
Nepal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 200 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 24%
Researcher 36 17%
Student > Master 28 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 34 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 45 21%
Environmental Science 36 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 24 11%
Engineering 19 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 7%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 39 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2024.
All research outputs
#682,578
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Geographics
#16
of 657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,971
of 178,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Geographics
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.