↓ Skip to main content

Estimation of current cumulative incidence of leukaemia-free patients and current leukaemia-free survival in chronic myeloid leukaemia in the era of modern pharmacotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Estimation of current cumulative incidence of leukaemia-free patients and current leukaemia-free survival in chronic myeloid leukaemia in the era of modern pharmacotherapy
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-11-140
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomáš Pavlík, Eva Janoušová, Zdeněk Pospíšil, Jan Mužík, Daniela Žáčková, Zdeněk Ráčil, Hana Klamová, Petr Cetkovský, Marek Trněný, Jiří Mayer, Ladislav Dušek

Abstract

The current situation in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) presents a new challenge for attempts to measure the therapeutic results, as the CML patients can experience multiple leukaemia-free periods during the course of their treatment. Traditional measures of treatment efficacy such as leukaemia-free survival and cumulative incidence are unable to cope with multiple events in time, e.g. disease remissions or progressions, and as such are inappropriate for the efficacy assessment of the recent CML treatment.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Croatia 1 9%
United Kingdom 1 9%
Unknown 9 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 45%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 27%
Student > Master 1 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 64%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 18%
Social Sciences 1 9%
Mathematics 1 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2011.
All research outputs
#2,017,643
of 3,628,118 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#303
of 487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,625
of 67,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#9
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,628,118 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 487 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.