↓ Skip to main content

A North American stem turaco, and the complex biogeographic history of modern birds

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Evolutionary Biology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 2,902)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
71 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
A North American stem turaco, and the complex biogeographic history of modern birds
Published in
BMC Evolutionary Biology, June 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12862-018-1212-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel J. Field, Allison Y. Hsiang

Abstract

Earth's lower latitudes boast the majority of extant avian species-level and higher-order diversity, with many deeply diverging clades restricted to vestiges of Gondwana. However, palaeontological analyses reveal that many avian crown clades with restricted extant distributions had stem group relatives in very different parts of the world. Our phylogenetic analyses support the enigmatic fossil bird Foro panarium Olson 1992 from the early Eocene (Wasatchian) of Wyoming as a stem turaco (Neornithes: Pan-Musophagidae), a clade that is presently endemic to sub-Saharan Africa. Our analyses offer the first well-supported evidence for a stem musophagid (and therefore a useful fossil calibration for avian molecular divergence analyses), and reveal surprising new information on the early morphology and biogeography of this clade. Total-clade Musophagidae is identified as a potential participant in dispersal via the recently proposed 'North American Gateway' during the Palaeogene, and new biogeographic analyses illustrate the importance of the fossil record in revealing the complex historical biogeography of crown birds across geological timescales. In the Palaeogene, total-clade Musophagidae was distributed well outside the range of crown Musophagidae in the present day. This observation is consistent with similar biogeographic observations for numerous other modern bird clades, illustrating shortcomings of historical biogeographic analyses that do not incorporate information from the avian fossil record.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 30%
Researcher 9 24%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Student > Master 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 43%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 11%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 10 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 137. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2021.
All research outputs
#237,867
of 22,029,478 outputs
Outputs from BMC Evolutionary Biology
#31
of 2,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,870
of 299,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Evolutionary Biology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,029,478 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them