Title |
Prevalence of facet joint pain in chronic spinal pain of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar regions
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, May 2004
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-5-15 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Laxmaiah Manchikanti, Mark V Boswell, Vijay Singh, Vidyasagar Pampati, Kim S Damron, Carla D Beyer |
Abstract |
Facet joints are a clinically important source of chronic cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine pain. The purpose of this study was to systematically evaluate the prevalence of facet joint pain by spinal region in patients with chronic spine pain referred to an interventional pain management practice. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 86% |
Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 43% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 312 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 303 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 59 | 19% |
Researcher | 32 | 10% |
Other | 31 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 8% |
Other | 87 | 28% |
Unknown | 48 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 163 | 52% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 9% |
Engineering | 16 | 5% |
Sports and Recreations | 12 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 3% |
Other | 32 | 10% |
Unknown | 52 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2023.
All research outputs
#3,694,330
of 23,299,593 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#719
of 4,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,692
of 58,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,299,593 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them