RT @Research_Tim: The rise of predatory publishing. In 2010 there were 53,000 articles in predatory journals. In 2014 there were 420,000.…
RT @PsychScientists: I think the clearest evidence academic publishing is broken is that it is worth scamming https://t.co/tiKDxJwSxs
RT @Research_Tim: The rise of predatory publishing. In 2010 there were 53,000 articles in predatory journals. In 2014 there were 420,000.…
RT @PsychScientists: I think the clearest evidence academic publishing is broken is that it is worth scamming https://t.co/tiKDxJwSxs
RT @PsychScientists: I think the clearest evidence academic publishing is broken is that it is worth scamming https://t.co/tiKDxJwSxs
RT @PsychScientists: I think the clearest evidence academic publishing is broken is that it is worth scamming https://t.co/tiKDxJwSxs
I think the clearest evidence academic publishing is broken is that it is worth scamming https://t.co/tiKDxJwSxs
RT @Research_Tim: The rise of predatory publishing. In 2010 there were 53,000 articles in predatory journals. In 2014 there were 420,000.…
RT @Research_Tim: The rise of predatory publishing. In 2010 there were 53,000 articles in predatory journals. In 2014 there were 420,000.…
RT @Research_Tim: The rise of predatory publishing. In 2010 there were 53,000 articles in predatory journals. In 2014 there were 420,000.…
The rise of predatory publishing. In 2010 there were 53,000 articles in predatory journals. In 2014 there were 420,000. Source: https://t.co/bvZrgZB66w https://t.co/2nBgFttqjK
In a market place of ~34,000 journals, are as many as 8,000 of them "predatory"? https://t.co/Dwxk5ioTMO Shen et al https://t.co/ECxZe8gTIP
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
Have a look at the original link in BMC Medicine. Interesting article. Don't like 'predatory' journal, but see reason for them https://t.co/nlKyupVn8M
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
Key elements: there's big money in #predatoryjournals, & young scientists are desperate to get published. #PRC8 https://t.co/4iPONLba7V
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics https://t.co/8qERgtBXVg
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @weitergen: Die Hälfte der Autoren in Predatory open Access Journals sind aus Indien oder Afrika. Die kriegen dort sicher noch mehr Spam…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @CesarOPallares: Las universidades debemos reforzar las estrategias pedagógicas para evitar que los investigadores sean victimas #predat…
Las universidades debemos reforzar las estrategias pedagógicas para evitar que los investigadores sean victimas #predatoryjournals https://t.co/WCl5xK1GB9
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
And that's only counting subpar research that didn't make it into non-predatory journals #PRC8 https://t.co/fXWddqzGFv
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
Die Hälfte der Autoren in Predatory open Access Journals sind aus Indien oder Afrika. Die kriegen dort sicher noch mehr Spam der Verlage. https://t.co/OTt8TC3vuY
‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics | BMC Medicine https://t.co/ed5Vw5wNnQ
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
RT @hildabast: By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PR…
By 2014, there were already >400,000 articles in >8,000 predatory journals: @robertsjasonl cites https://t.co/ZJeI6n7eVm #PRC8 https://t.co/GvWmYIqyl9
RT @Science_Open: ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics https://t.co/oJvu6XPouz via @…
RT @Science_Open: ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics https://t.co/oJvu6XPouz via @…
RT @Science_Open: ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics https://t.co/oJvu6XPouz via @…
RT @Science_Open: ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics https://t.co/oJvu6XPouz via @…
RT @Science_Open: ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics https://t.co/oJvu6XPouz via @…
‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics https://t.co/oJvu6XPouz via @BioMedCentral
‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics https://t.co/SEER70Nh5h
الناشرون المفترسون والمجلات العلمية الغير رصينة https://t.co/8Hi0W5gmHd
‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics https://t.co/XTaYoKI1bR https://t.co/B6LSS3KWCA
‘Predatory’ #OpenAccess: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics https://t.co/xcHl5yMJqG #predatoryjournal #OA
RT @Science_Open: ‘Predatory’ #openaccess: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics https://t.co/oJvu6Y6Zm7 via @…
RT @Science_Open: ‘Predatory’ #openaccess: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics https://t.co/oJvu6Y6Zm7 via @…
RT @Science_Open: ‘Predatory’ #openaccess: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics https://t.co/oJvu6Y6Zm7 via @…
"Predatory’ OA: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics" (Cenyu Shen, Bo-Christer Björk) https://t.co/KJ0bAZp5fM
RT @Science_Open: ‘Predatory’ #openaccess: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics https://t.co/oJvu6Y6Zm7 via @…
RT @Science_Open: ‘Predatory’ #openaccess: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics https://t.co/oJvu6Y6Zm7 via @…
RT @Science_Open: ‘Predatory’ #openaccess: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics https://t.co/oJvu6Y6Zm7 via @…
‘Predatory’ #openaccess: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics https://t.co/oJvu6Y6Zm7 via @BioMedCentral
Paper cited in previous tweet #uksg17 https://t.co/1x4hvWyefv
RT @ISSN_IC: #UKSG17 @samulack is quoting figures from Shen and Björk, “‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study...”, https://t.co/Al3…
#UKSG17 @samulack is quoting figures from Shen and Björk, “‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study...”, https://t.co/Al3pTQrLF2
‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics https://t.co/zs1bhDW5Nn
RT @dannykay68: ESTIMATE of no of articles published in predatory journals in 2014 - 420,000 https://t.co/AnSDQqBjDM #urfistopensci
RT @dannykay68: ESTIMATE of no of articles published in predatory journals in 2014 - 420,000 https://t.co/AnSDQqBjDM #urfistopensci
ESTIMATE of no of articles published in predatory journals in 2014 - 420,000 https://t.co/AnSDQqBjDM #urfistopensci
@Dr_BowTie65 @HeartOTXHeartMD @JJheart_doc @Medscape At @CUMedicalSchool, that strategy might get you fired, but it's a problem in Asia/Africa that continues unchecked. https://t.co/G9WGBroXik https://t.co/U2cQUPQdkZ
‘Predatory’ junk journals published 400,00 junk science papers. Real science community needs tougher response. https://t.co/lvLq2DRbeZ
“Predatory” journals are demonstrably a marginal phenomenon in the global North. https://t.co/I0hLLDjqM4
Between 2010 & 2014, predatory journals have increased publication volumes from 53,000 to 420,000 articles: https://t.co/tqc5A8Ld0i #PhDchat