‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics http://t.co/smjttDThnf #bmcmedicine
RT @hend_alkhalifa: #البحث_العلمي دراسة مثيرة توضح تضاعف نمو المجلات المفتوحة المشبوهة سريعة النشر ومعظم زبائنها باحثين في آسيا وأفريقيا ht…
#البحث_العلمي دراسة مثيرة توضح تضاعف نمو المجلات المفتوحة المشبوهة سريعة النشر ومعظم زبائنها باحثين في آسيا وأفريقيا http://t.co/arVxyVZPwr
RT @MaireCaffrey: more about the growth of "predatory" open access @RNIreland @PhDskills http://t.co/HyncVzWIzM
more about the growth of "predatory" open access @RNIreland @PhDskills http://t.co/HyncVzWIzM
RT @paimadhu: Holy cow! 8000 predatory OA journals have gone from 53,000 to 420000 articles in a 4 year period! http://t.co/b8xcgKJo7s - sc…
Holy cow! 8000 predatory OA journals have gone from 53,000 to 420000 articles in a 4 year period! http://t.co/b8xcgKJo7s - scary stuff!!
RT @JohnnyFoxe: ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics http://t.co/FvdqcF4Nc1 #bmcmed…
The plague of ‘Predatory’ publishers http://t.co/l0RbfADege #bmcmedicine #research #science http://t.co/CEjBrrAJKj
‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics http://t.co/Yb2EtDZSqE #bmcmedicine
The rise of open-access publishing http://t.co/1t2e4DgLUh cited in https://t.co/FU8bh51NHF via @EricTopol @BioMedCentral and @NatureNews
RT @EricTopol The rise of "predatory" open-access pseudo-scientific journals http://t.co/1t2e4DgLUh cited in https://t.co/FU8bh51NHF
‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics http://t.co/114nDBlCWd #bmcmedicine
What's the impact of 'predatory' journals on the open access model's reputation? New study in @BMCMedicine http://t.co/bO8DXl3kmX
RT @SeminarioHD: Despite a total number of journals and publishing volumes comparable to respectable (indexed by the Directory of... http:/…
Despite a total number of journals and publishing volumes comparable to respectable (indexed by the Directory of... http://t.co/35BJsqXLJy
BMC Medicine #Predatory #OpenAccess: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics http://t.co/o0mDjDhoGS
‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics http://t.co/Hj6T3CwbxK #bmcmedicine
RT @BioMedCentral: Investigating 'Predatory Publishers' with questionable #PeerReview practices, a growing problem: http://t.co/TBDYkgS9Zh
RT @BioMedCentral: New @BMCMedicine study sheds light on 'Predatory Publishers' with questionable #PeerReview practices: http://t.co/bMBL8…
‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics http://t.co/HJ7ctbv52R #bmcmedicine
RT @Vet_Evidence: ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics http://t.co/JKSAk8qaH1 #bmcm…
‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics http://t.co/JKSAk8qaH1 #bmcmedicine
RT @BioMedCentral: A study of 'predatory' #openaccess journals, whose numbers grew from 53,000 in 2010 to 420,000 in 2014: https://t.co/mN…
お、月刊DRFに取り上げた論文がやっと雑誌掲載・公開された / “BMC Medicine | Full text | ‘Predatory’ op…” http://t.co/WTwbLiR9Yd #science #university #エレクトリック #オープンアクセス
RT @PauliOhukainen: Problem of predatory #openaccess journals seems to be contained to a few countries │ http://t.co/kDhZawtJMD
Autores publicam artigo em questionam estratégias de revisão por pares, adotadas por periódicos de livre acesso. http://t.co/TlS921FaiO
RT @fosterscience: RT @Stephen_Curry:Predatory journals are on the rise: http://t.co/eYhI6HJzPL Use this tool to avoid being caught out: ht…
RT @JohnnyFoxe: ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics http://t.co/FvdqcF4Nc1 #bmcmed…
‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics http://t.co/v03iToH2gR #bmcmedicine
RT @JohnnyFoxe: ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics http://t.co/FvdqcF4Nc1 #bmcmed…
RT @BioMedCentral: Investigating 'Predatory Publishers' with questionable #PeerReview practices, a growing problem: http://t.co/TBDYkgS9Zh
Investigating 'Predatory Publishers' with questionable #PeerReview practices, a growing problem: http://t.co/TBDYkgS9Zh
‘Predatory’ #openaccess: new study http://t.co/QHPlH0TIZ4 Retr watch comment: http://t.co/pecrZ2jgGs
RT @elbjoern0603: @RetractionWatch on Shen/Björk paper (http://t.co/r9azSQFHKX) – http://t.co/t6mJOFtvuI - my comment – wrong numbers? @DOA…
@RetractionWatch on Shen/Björk paper (http://t.co/r9azSQFHKX) – http://t.co/t6mJOFtvuI - my comment – wrong numbers? @DOAJplus
RT @moonlighter1965: 'Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics http://t.co/2w0l1vQKdz (by…
RT @trished: #WAME @jocalynclark on must-read, chilling new study BMC Medicine | ‘Predatory’ open access http://t.co/SbucI3fdU4
RT @BioMedCentral: New @BMCMedicine study sheds light on 'Predatory Publishers' with questionable #PeerReview practices: http://t.co/oyrfB…
RT @VergaraLautaro: @JorgeBabul @gonzalogutierrg ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market ... http://…
RT @VergaraLautaro: @JorgeBabul @gonzalogutierrg ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market ... http://…
@JorgeBabul @gonzalogutierrg ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market ... http://t.co/VMwOA3ZbRN
Longitudinal study of ‘#predatory’ journal publishing demonstrates the need for #journal education! @BioMedCentral http://t.co/muE7FVBSzd
RT @SpringerOpen: RT @BioMedCentral: A study of 'predatory' #oa journals, whose numbers grew from 53,000 in 2010 to 420,000 in 2014 http:/…
RT @BioMedCentral: A study of 'predatory' #oa journals, whose numbers grew from 53,000 in 2010 to 420,000 in 2014 http://t.co/NOiNDr5mRO
‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes... BMC Medicine. 2015,13: 230 http://t.co/AX1r8OwwEA
RT @BioMedCentral: New @BMCMedicine study sheds light on 'Predatory Publishers' with questionable #PeerReview practices: http://t.co/oyrfB…
RT @BioMedCentral: New @BMCMedicine study sheds light on 'Predatory Publishers' with questionable #PeerReview practices: http://t.co/oyrfB…
RT @BioMedCentral: New @BMCMedicine study sheds light on 'Predatory Publishers' with questionable #PeerReview practices: http://t.co/oyrfB…
RT @BioMedCentral: New @BMCMedicine study sheds light on 'Predatory Publishers' with questionable #PeerReview practices: http://t.co/oyrfB…
‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. http://t.co/dvYX4IYImw
RT @BioMedCentral: New @BMCMedicine study sheds light on 'Predatory Publishers' with questionable #PeerReview practices: http://t.co/oyrfB…
RT @BioMedCentral: New @BMCMedicine study sheds light on 'Predatory Publishers' with questionable #PeerReview practices: http://t.co/oyrfB…
New @BMCMedicine study sheds light on 'Predatory Publishers' with questionable #PeerReview practices: http://t.co/oyrfBTbqc5
RT @JohnnyFoxe: ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics http://t.co/FvdqcF4Nc1 #bmcmed…
RT @trished: #WAME @jocalynclark on must-read, chilling new study BMC Medicine | ‘Predatory’ open access http://t.co/SbucI3fdU4
‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics http://t.co/FvdqcF4Nc1 #bmcmedicine
@mj_powers At this point, nothing would surprise me. Here's some good data on "predatory" jrnls http://t.co/5lwnlAQhXT
Study: # of #academic articles in predatory journals increased from 53K in 2010 to 420K in 2014 http://t.co/qS5vzrrLtd #research #highered
RT @trished: #WAME @jocalynclark on must-read, chilling new study BMC Medicine | ‘Predatory’ open access http://t.co/SbucI3fdU4
RT @trished: #WAME @jocalynclark on must-read, chilling new study BMC Medicine | ‘Predatory’ open access http://t.co/SbucI3fdU4
RT @trished: #WAME @jocalynclark on must-read, chilling new study BMC Medicine | ‘Predatory’ open access http://t.co/SbucI3fdU4
RT @trished: #WAME @jocalynclark on must-read, chilling new study BMC Medicine | ‘Predatory’ open access http://t.co/SbucI3fdU4
RT @DrRodRohrich: Retweeted Trish Groves (@trished): #WAME @jocalynclark on must-read, chilling new study BMC Medicine |... http://t.co/Iv…
Retweeted Trish Groves (@trished): #WAME @jocalynclark on must-read, chilling new study BMC Medicine |... http://t.co/IvgvbQNsdZ
RT @trished: #WAME @jocalynclark on must-read, chilling new study BMC Medicine | ‘Predatory’ open access http://t.co/SbucI3fdU4
RT @trished: #WAME @jocalynclark on must-read, chilling new study BMC Medicine | ‘Predatory’ open access http://t.co/SbucI3fdU4
RT @trished: #WAME @jocalynclark on must-read, chilling new study BMC Medicine | ‘Predatory’ open access http://t.co/SbucI3fdU4
RT @trished: #WAME @jocalynclark on must-read, chilling new study BMC Medicine | ‘Predatory’ open access http://t.co/SbucI3fdU4
RT @trished: #WAME @jocalynclark on must-read, chilling new study BMC Medicine | ‘Predatory’ open access http://t.co/SbucI3fdU4
RT @trished: #WAME @jocalynclark on must-read, chilling new study BMC Medicine | ‘Predatory’ open access http://t.co/SbucI3fdU4
RT @trished: #WAME @jocalynclark on must-read, chilling new study BMC Medicine | ‘Predatory’ open access http://t.co/SbucI3fdU4
#WAME @jocalynclark on must-read, chilling new study BMC Medicine | ‘Predatory’ open access http://t.co/SbucI3fdU4
RT @SciReports: New @BMCMedicine study sheds light on 'Predatory Publishers' with questionable #PeerReview practices: http://t.co/GbK2hvub…
RT @SciReports: New @BMCMedicine study sheds light on 'Predatory Publishers' with questionable #PeerReview practices: http://t.co/GbK2hvub…
‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics http://t.co/YqVVmXlyvW
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Predatory publishing is a problem wherever "evaluation practices favor international publication" over quality http://t.…
RT @BioMedCentral: A study of 'predatory' #openaccess journals - from 53,000 articles in 2010 to 420,000 articles in 2014: http://t.co/kik…
"these authors are part of a structurally unjust global system that excludes them from ‘high quality’ journals" http://t.co/5EoNOBqC6w
RT @BioMedCentral: A study of 'predatory' #openaccess journals - from 53,000 articles in 2010 to 420,000 articles in 2014: http://t.co/kik…
‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics http://t.co/pQNZzvjNPz
RT @BioMedCentral: A study of 'predatory' #openaccess journals - from 53,000 articles in 2010 to 420,000 articles in 2014: http://t.co/kik…
RT @BioMedCentral: A study of 'predatory' #openaccess journals - from 53,000 articles in 2010 to 420,000 articles in 2014: http://t.co/kik…
@yvonnenobis @Richard56 http://t.co/dBqK12oxF9 or BMC Medicine 2015, 13:230 doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2
@yvonnenobis I think it was here: http://t.co/4GW7aRYxRX
‘#Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics http://t.co/1IVmPwv9sm #OA #CC via T. Hameau
RT @BioMedCentral: A study of 'predatory' #openaccess journals - from 53,000 articles in 2010 to 420,000 articles in 2014: http://t.co/kik…
RT @SciReports: New @BMCMedicine study sheds light on 'Predatory Publishers' with questionable #PeerReview practices: http://t.co/GbK2hvub…
Longitudinal study of predatory publishing from @bmcmedicine http://t.co/DPxc1HZssc #thinkchecksubmit http://t.co/BMMTGjZJqp
RT @SciReports: New @BMCMedicine study sheds light on 'Predatory Publishers' with questionable #PeerReview practices: http://t.co/GbK2hvub…
Autores questionam estratégias de marketing e de revisão por pares adotadas por periódicos de livre acesso. http://t.co/TlS921WLHo
RT @SciReports: New @BMCMedicine study sheds light on 'Predatory Publishers' with questionable #PeerReview practices: http://t.co/GbK2hvub…
New @BMCMedicine study sheds light on 'Predatory Publishers' with questionable #PeerReview practices: http://t.co/GbK2hvubJT #peerrevwk15
RT @BioMedCentral: A study of 'predatory' #openaccess journals, whose numbers grew from 53,000 in 2010 to 420,000 in 2014: http://t.co/5oE…
RT @TonysAngle: "Predatory journals": from 53,000 articles in 2010 to 420,000 in 2014, published by some 8,000 active journals http://t.co/…
RT @TonysAngle: "Predatory journals": from 53,000 articles in 2010 to 420,000 in 2014, published by some 8,000 active journals http://t.co/…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Predatory publishing is a problem wherever "evaluation practices favor international publication" over quality http://t.…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Predatory publishing is a problem wherever "evaluation practices favor international publication" over quality http://t.…
Predatory publishing is a problem wherever "evaluation practices favor international publication" over quality http://t.co/QoywsTFQDJ