↓ Skip to main content

What difference does ("good") HRM make?

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, June 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
What difference does ("good") HRM make?
Published in
Human Resources for Health, June 2004
DOI 10.1186/1478-4491-2-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

James Buchan

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Morocco 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 125 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 16%
Student > Postgraduate 20 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Researcher 12 9%
Other 33 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 39 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 19%
Social Sciences 18 13%
Unspecified 12 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Other 32 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#2,323,491
of 8,838,295 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#361
of 581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,012
of 245,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#23
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,838,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 60th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 581 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.