↓ Skip to main content

Emerging advantages and drawbacks of telephone surveying in public health research in Ireland and the U.K

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Emerging advantages and drawbacks of telephone surveying in public health research in Ireland and the U.K
Published in
BMC Public Health, August 2006
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-6-208
Pubmed ID
Authors

M Boland, MR Sweeney, E Scallan, M Harrington, A Staines

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 59 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Researcher 5 8%
Professor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 16 26%
Unknown 14 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 17 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2015.
All research outputs
#7,468,426
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,891
of 14,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,959
of 66,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.