Title |
Potential of selected Senegalese Aedes spp. mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) to transmit Zika virus
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12879-015-1231-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cheikh Tidiane Diagne, Diawo Diallo, Oumar Faye, Yamar Ba, Ousmane Faye, Alioune Gaye, Ibrahima Dia, Ousmane Faye, Scott C. Weaver, Amadou Alpha Sall, Mawlouth Diallo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 2 | 25% |
Germany | 1 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
Denmark | 1 | 13% |
Brazil | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 371 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 5 | 1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Saint Kitts and Nevis | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Other | 3 | <1% |
Unknown | 353 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 66 | 18% |
Student > Master | 54 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 51 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 7% |
Other | 83 | 22% |
Unknown | 44 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 110 | 30% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 16% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 52 | 14% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 22 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 4% |
Other | 56 | 15% |
Unknown | 58 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2018.
All research outputs
#662,585
of 24,744,050 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#153
of 8,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,170
of 291,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#4
of 165 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,744,050 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 165 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.