↓ Skip to main content

Biochemical comparison of osteoarthritic knees with and without effusion

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Biochemical comparison of osteoarthritic knees with and without effusion
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-12-273
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole M Cattano, Jeffrey B Driban, Easwaran Balasubramanian, Mary F Barbe, Mamta Amin, Michael R Sitler

Abstract

Several symptom-relieving interventions have been shown to be efficacious among osteoarthritis (OA) patients with knee effusion; however, not every symptomatic knee OA patient has clinical effusion. Results may be over-generalized since it is unclear if effused knees represent a unique pathological condition or subset compared to knees without effusion. The primary purpose of this study was to determine if biochemical differences existed between OA knees with and without effusion.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 20%
Student > Bachelor 4 16%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 4 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2011.
All research outputs
#10,995,907
of 12,373,620 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,252
of 2,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,341
of 219,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#150
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,373,620 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.