↓ Skip to main content

Idiopathic toe walking and sensory processing dysfunction

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
Title
Idiopathic toe walking and sensory processing dysfunction
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, August 2010
DOI 10.1186/1757-1146-3-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cylie M Williams, Paul Tinley, Michael Curtin

Abstract

It is generally understood that toe walking involves the absence or limitation of heel strike in the contact phase of the gait cycle. Toe walking has been identified as a symptom of disease processes, trauma and/or neurogenic influences. When there is no obvious cause of the gait pattern, a diagnosis of idiopathic toe walking (ITW) is made. Although there has been limited research into the pathophysiology of ITW, there has been an increasing number of contemporary texts and practitioner debates proposing that this gait pattern is linked to a sensory processing dysfunction (SPD). The purpose of this paper is to examine the literature and provide a summary of what is known about the relationship between toe walking and SPD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Malta 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 161 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 15%
Other 22 13%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Other 42 25%
Unknown 36 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 26%
Engineering 9 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Sports and Recreations 3 2%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 38 23%