Title |
Vaccination against 2009 pandemic H1N1 in a population dynamical model of Vancouver, Canada: timing is everything
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, December 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-932 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jessica M Conway, Ashleigh R Tuite, David N Fisman, Nathaniel Hupert, Rafael Meza, Bahman Davoudi, Krista English, P van den Driessche, Fred Brauer, Junling Ma, Lauren Ancel Meyers, Marek Smieja, Amy Greer, Danuta M Skowronski, David L Buckeridge, Jeffrey C Kwong, Jianhong Wu, Seyed M Moghadas, Daniel Coombs, Robert C Brunham, Babak Pourbohloul |
Abstract |
Much remains unknown about the effect of timing and prioritization of vaccination against pandemic (pH1N1) 2009 virus on health outcomes. We adapted a city-level contact network model to study different campaigns on influenza morbidity and mortality. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 40% |
Canada | 1 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 108 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 27 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 15% |
Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
Other | 21 | 18% |
Unknown | 22 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 26% |
Psychology | 7 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
Mathematics | 6 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
Other | 26 | 23% |
Unknown | 34 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2011.
All research outputs
#6,909,831
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,265
of 14,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,445
of 242,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#81
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.