... an abnormally low ratio of patient numbers to study site, spin and/or omissions of clinically relevant findings in the abstracts, and conclusions that focused on secondary endpoints and surrogate markers. These characteristics are from Barbour et al.
...4/ We suggest that the trial could be a "seeding trial", a trial driven by marketing interest. Seeding trials enroll typically a low number of patients from a large number of sites. See this paper... https://t.co/KixFIQeaFW
Seeding trials are « industry-funded drug trials that are done more for marketing purposes than science». https://t.co/KixFIQeaFW
Analysis of trial documentation has revealed that some industry-funded trials may be done more for marketing purposes than scientific endeavour. Seeding Trials? @carlheneghan @fgodlee @bengoldacre @Opsore @RichardLehman1 @MeshCampaign @BioMedCentral http
RT @FibroidNetwork: @statnews Analysis of trial documentation has revealed that some industry-funded trials may be done more for marketing…
@statsepi I recommend this one https://t.co/O0Q82q48Jm
RT @FibroidNetwork: @statnews Analysis of trial documentation has revealed that some industry-funded trials may be done more for marketing…
RT @FibroidNetwork: @statnews Analysis of trial documentation has revealed that some industry-funded trials may be done more for marketing…
RT @FibroidNetwork: @statnews Analysis of trial documentation has revealed that some industry-funded trials may be done more for marketing…
RT @jsross119: @VincentRK @TheWonkologist @peterbachmd @DrKevinHill @hmkyale A group of us (including @GinnyBarbour @carlheneghan @RichardL…
@VincentRK @TheWonkologist @peterbachmd @DrKevinHill @hmkyale A group of us (including @GinnyBarbour @carlheneghan @RichardLehman1 @fgodlee) tried to systematically characterize these in literature but found it quite tricky to do https://t.co/VzNsjpRk71
RT @AbelNovoa: @Isabelalor2015 @vbaosv @RoberRimbaud @cecilicp @rafabravo @nogracias_eu @Firefly_fan Lamentablemente los médicos juegan a i…
@Isabelalor2015 @vbaosv @RoberRimbaud @cecilicp @rafabravo @nogracias_eu @Firefly_fan Lamentablemente los médicos juegan a investigadores mientras la industria juega a vender productos https://t.co/6nZEFFLQgq Incluso entre los ECAs publicados en las big fi
@gorskon @ABatemanHouse @pknoepfler @ejwillingham @CaulfieldTim @aarondlevine @ScienceBasedMed Oh, that's no defense against profit masquerading as research. See, for example, "marketing trials." (Ref. below.) Big names get involved in those, too. https://
RT @FibroidNetwork: @statnews Analysis of trial documentation has revealed that some industry-funded trials may be done more for marketing…
RT @FibroidNetwork: @statnews Analysis of trial documentation has revealed that some industry-funded trials may be done more for marketing…
RT @FibroidNetwork: @statnews Analysis of trial documentation has revealed that some industry-funded trials may be done more for marketing…
@statnews Analysis of trial documentation has revealed that some industry-funded trials may be done more for marketing purposes than scientific endeavour. Seeding Trials? @carlheneghan @fgodlee @bengoldacre @RichardLehman1 @MeshCampaign https://t.co/QvB
RT @carlheneghan: Characterisation of trials where marketing purposes have been influential in study design: a descriptive study https://…
RT @JuanGrvas: @Firefly_fan Hay mucho y muy bueno sobre: Seeding Trials: Just Say “No” https://t.co/v3A9rasqnR Characterisation of trials…
RT @JuanGrvas: @Firefly_fan Hay mucho y muy bueno sobre: Seeding Trials: Just Say “No” https://t.co/v3A9rasqnR Characterisation of trials…
@Firefly_fan Hay mucho y muy bueno sobre: Seeding Trials: Just Say “No” https://t.co/v3A9rasqnR Characterisation of trials where marketing purposes have been influential in study design https://t.co/dHyJfoMbeA Marketing trials, marketing tricks https://t.
@jamie_love @VinayPrasad82 There are 2 different questions to ask: 1- What are the pharma companies actually spending in R&D, this could include marketing trials and outlays https://t.co/Af9zZjpWTl 2- the other question is are these costs justified by
RT @trished: Research or marketing? Read @RichardLehman1 blog https://t.co/Rtf71FxLVh and then this study https://t.co/qUWTRHhnZp
RT @trished: Research or marketing? Read @RichardLehman1 blog https://t.co/Rtf71FxLVh and then this study https://t.co/qUWTRHhnZp
RT @trished: Research or marketing? Read @RichardLehman1 blog https://t.co/Rtf71FxLVh and then this study https://t.co/qUWTRHhnZp
Research or marketing? Read @RichardLehman1 blog https://t.co/Rtf71FxLVh and then this study https://t.co/qUWTRHhnZp
1/5 of drug trials in high IF med journals in 2011 had features suggestive of being designed for marketing purposes https://t.co/E3lDFeeRkD
RT @pash22: Marketing purposes have been influential in study design of 20% trials https://t.co/lUamJ7JHno via @GinnyBarbour https://t.co/…
Marketing purposes have been influential in study design of 20% trials https://t.co/lUamJ7JHno via @GinnyBarbour https://t.co/wZGyDAlDaF
RT @LizSturgiss: "1/5 drug trials in the highest impact medical journals..had features..of being designed for marketing" @NoAdsPlease https…
Clinical trials for marketing purposes #clinicaltrials https://t.co/sj575M5fe3
Study: 20% of published drug trials seem to have been conducted predominantly for marketing purposes https://t.co/q5WygQJdHu #PublicHealth
Medical science or commerce? 21% drug trials in the highest impact medical journals likely designed for marketing. https://t.co/6IDUucT4Tm
Characterisation of trials where marketing purposes have been influential in study design: https://t.co/pnezVsvqM2 #trialsjournal
RT @Richard56: 21% of trials in major journals are primarily marketing. Most are in the NEJ or Lancet. https://t.co/H8O6QgFdn2 #trialsjourn…
RT @Richard56: 21% of trials in major journals are primarily marketing. Most are in the NEJ or Lancet. https://t.co/H8O6QgFdn2 #trialsjourn…
RT @CebmOxford: Confirmed @EvidenceLive speakers @fgodlee and @cebmblog - are some RCTs more about marketing than science? https://t.co/gqS…
RT @CebmOxford: Confirmed @EvidenceLive speakers @fgodlee and @cebmblog - are some RCTs more about marketing than science? https://t.co/gqS…
RT @methodsmanmd: Fascinating report estimates that 20% of clinical trials performed for "marketing purposes", not science. https://t.co/t…
RT @methodsmanmd: Fascinating report estimates that 20% of clinical trials performed for "marketing purposes", not science. https://t.co/t…
RT @Richard56: 21% of trials in major journals are primarily marketing. Most are in the NEJ or Lancet. https://t.co/H8O6QgFdn2 #trialsjourn…
RT @Richard56: 21% of trials in major journals are primarily marketing. Most are in the NEJ or Lancet. https://t.co/H8O6QgFdn2 #trialsjourn…
RT @Richard56: 21% of trials in major journals are primarily marketing. Most are in the NEJ or Lancet. https://t.co/H8O6QgFdn2 #trialsjourn…
RT @CebmOxford: Confirmed @EvidenceLive speakers @fgodlee and @cebmblog - are some RCTs more about marketing than science? https://t.co/gqS…
RT @CebmOxford: Confirmed @EvidenceLive speakers @fgodlee and @cebmblog - are some RCTs more about marketing than science? https://t.co/gqS…
RT @Richard56: 21% of trials in major journals are primarily marketing. Most are in the NEJ or Lancet. https://t.co/H8O6QgFdn2 #trialsjourn…
@NEJM stands for New England Journal of Marketing. https://t.co/WZhDXUPIXM @RichardLehman1 @cebmblog https://t.co/w28ccFsNtA
RT @Richard56: 21% of trials in major journals are primarily marketing. Most are in the NEJ or Lancet. https://t.co/H8O6QgFdn2 #trialsjourn…
RT @Richard56: 21% of trials in major journals are primarily marketing. Most are in the NEJ or Lancet. https://t.co/H8O6QgFdn2 #trialsjourn…
RT @Richard56: 21% of trials in major journals are primarily marketing. Most are in the NEJ or Lancet. https://t.co/H8O6QgFdn2 #trialsjourn…
RT @CebmOxford: Confirmed @EvidenceLive speakers @fgodlee and @cebmblog - are some RCTs more about marketing than science? https://t.co/gqS…
RT @Richard56: 21% of trials in major journals are primarily marketing. Most are in the NEJ or Lancet. https://t.co/H8O6QgFdn2 #trialsjourn…
RT @Richard56: 21% of trials in major journals are primarily marketing. Most are in the NEJ or Lancet. https://t.co/H8O6QgFdn2 #trialsjourn…
RT @Richard56: 21% of trials in major journals are primarily marketing. Most are in the NEJ or Lancet. https://t.co/H8O6QgFdn2 #trialsjourn…
RT @CebmOxford: Confirmed @EvidenceLive speakers @fgodlee and @cebmblog - are some RCTs more about marketing than science? https://t.co/gqS…
RT @CebmOxford: Confirmed @EvidenceLive speakers @fgodlee and @cebmblog - are some RCTs more about marketing than science? https://t.co/gqS…
Confirmed @EvidenceLive speakers @fgodlee and @cebmblog - are some RCTs more about marketing than science? https://t.co/gqSKIORZXn
RT @Richard56: 21% of trials in major journals are primarily marketing. Most are in the NEJ or Lancet. https://t.co/H8O6QgFdn2 #trialsjourn…
RT @Richard56: 21% of trials in major journals are primarily marketing. Most are in the NEJ or Lancet. https://t.co/H8O6QgFdn2 #trialsjourn…
RT @Richard56: 21% of trials in major journals are primarily marketing. Most are in the NEJ or Lancet. https://t.co/H8O6QgFdn2 #trialsjourn…
RT @Richard56: 21% of trials in major journals are primarily marketing. Most are in the NEJ or Lancet. https://t.co/H8O6QgFdn2 #trialsjourn…
"1/5 drug trials in the highest impact medical journals..had features..of being designed for marketing" @NoAdsPlease https://t.co/ook4VMPONX
RT @Richard56: 21% of trials in major journals are primarily marketing. Most are in the NEJ or Lancet. https://t.co/H8O6QgFdn2 #trialsjourn…
21% of trials in major journals are primarily marketing. Most are in the NEJ or Lancet. https://t.co/H8O6QgFdn2 #trialsjournal
RT @briandavidearp: Characterisation of trials where marketing purposes have been influential in study design: a descriptive study https://…
RT @briandavidearp: Characterisation of trials where marketing purposes have been influential in study design: a descriptive study https://…
Characterisation of trials where marketing purposes have been influential in study design: a descriptive study https://t.co/I67UxGh1d1
Characterisation of trials where marketing purposes have been influential in study design: a descriptive study [pdf] https://t.co/VlMxSnhuAV
RT @EvidBaseMed_BMJ: 1/5 drug trials in highest impact gen medical journals had features suggestive of being designed for marketing https:/…
RT @ScholarlyChickn: Define then confirm. Does the medical marketing study simply confirm authors' circular reasoning? https://t.co/Xddmmqe…
Characterisation of trials where marketing purposes have been influential in study design: a descriptive study https://t.co/63UheFKXBB
RT @ScholarlyChickn: Define then confirm. Does the medical marketing study simply confirm authors' circular reasoning? https://t.co/Xddmmqe…
In top medical journals, 1 in 5 reported studies designed for #drugmarketing, not science. https://t.co/v5lMA9SmW8 https://t.co/Lp8pqJYwWG
Define then confirm. Does the medical marketing study simply confirm authors' circular reasoning? https://t.co/XddmmqeJK6
1/5 drug trials in highest impact gen medical journals had features suggestive of being designed for marketing https://t.co/SWckudtPyr
RT @drjohnm: 20% of trials in major med journals done for marketing > https://t.co/tRas518Z5X < Why aren’t we taught this in #meded? h/t @…
RT @drjohnm: 20% of trials in major med journals done for marketing > https://t.co/tRas518Z5X < Why aren’t we taught this in #meded? h/t @…
#clinicaltrials y Marketing: Cuál es su verdadero propósito? Reflexión.http://https://t.co/fRDne8Ida4
RT @methodsmanmd: Fascinating report estimates that 20% of clinical trials performed for "marketing purposes", not science. https://t.co/t…
https://t.co/HuURTsUJcp a former pharmacy exec's response to https://t.co/4Z4trMgp5A
Are some #clinicaltrials conducted mainly for marketing purposes? Interesting study funded by @C0PE. Article here: https://t.co/aGbG5zjTjS
RT @methodsmanmd: Fascinating report estimates that 20% of clinical trials performed for "marketing purposes", not science. https://t.co/t…
RT @fgodlee: Our study asks whether some RCTs are more about marketing than science https://t.co/Hpgw43kG3E
RT @EvidenceLive: 1/5 drug trials published had features of being designed for marketing @fgodlee @cebmblog https://t.co/YWaEzXYC0E https:/…
RT @EvidenceLive: 1/5 drug trials published had features of being designed for marketing @fgodlee @cebmblog https://t.co/YWaEzXYC0E https:/…
RT @TheLiceMeister: Characterization of clinical trials where marketing purposes influenced the study's design. https://t.co/07BmvPrQJd
RT @drjohnm: 20% of trials in major med journals done for marketing > https://t.co/tRas518Z5X < Why aren’t we taught this in #meded? h/t @…
RT @methodsmanmd: Fascinating report estimates that 20% of clinical trials performed for "marketing purposes", not science. https://t.co/t…
New report characterises trials where marketing purposes have been influential in study design: https://t.co/ljj09R2hRQ
Characterization of clinical trials where marketing purposes influenced the study's design. https://t.co/07BmvPrQJd
Un 20% de los ensayos clínicos se hacen por temas de marketing, no por razones científicas. https://t.co/6v2wFOqebt
Are 1/5 of trials done "more for marketing purposes than scientific endeavour"? Looks plausible https://t.co/6Oz8E8O20a via @danrshan
28% of drug trials are done for marketing purposes. This is what mainstream medicine is based on. Can you trust it? https://t.co/WuKOVZD52h
Recruitment characteristics by marketing clinical trials - read more via #Trials: https://t.co/V4Bn5YE6FT https://t.co/XnXr2vNtVA
Characterisation of trials where marketing purposes have been influential in study design:… https://t.co/wHQCThgsm2 https://t.co/Qo35p9nglJ