| Title |
Long-term prognosis of breast cancer detected by mammography screening or other methods
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Breast Cancer Research, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/bcr3080 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tiina Lehtimäki, Mikael Lundin, Nina Linder, Harri Sihto, Kaija Holli, Taina Turpeenniemi-Hujanen, Vesa Kataja, Jorma Isola, Heikki Joensuu, Johan Lundin |
| Abstract |
Previous studies of breast cancer have shown that patients whose tumors are detected by mammography screening have a more favorable survival. Little is known, however, about the long-term prognostic impact of screen detection. The purpose of the current study was to compare breast cancer-specific long-term survival of patients whose tumors were detected in mammography screening compared with those whose tumors were detected by other methods. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hungary | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 25% |
| Unknown | 7 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 50% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,411,964
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#875
of 1,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,489
of 243,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#21
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.